Sitecore Dev for Public Arts Funder
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I’m the web and brand director for the Canada Council for the Arts. We are a open arts funder.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Apiqu Inc.?
We were looking for extra outgrowth support. We wanted to find a provider with expertise in Sitecore, which is our full treatment method.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were Apiqu responsible for?
The leading project they did was redeveloping and revamping the Canadian Commission for UNESCO (CCUNESCO) website. It had almost 200 pages in English and French. We granted them with the design compowebsites, and they did both the front- and backend outgrowth of the website. Search functionality and a blog were added to the new website.
Was there a dedicated team?
Our main touch was their CTO. We also had some opportunities to adjoin straightly with the developers.
How did you come to work with Apiqu Inc.?
We went through a competitive process of sending out an RFP. After evaluating their offer, we establish they met all of our criteria and passed the evaluation.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
We spent $30,000 CAD (approachly $23,000 USD) for the CCUNESCO website.
What is the terminal result of working with Apiqu?
The CCUNESCO website outgrowth took locate from October–December 2017. We’ve hired them for other outgrowth projects, and we just completed one that launched today.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
The client was very pleased with the CCUNESCO website revamp. The feedback we got from users is that it’s more user well-inclined in comparison to the antecedent rendering. They love the added functionality as well. We’re veritably pleased with how knowledgeable and competent they are with Sitecore.
How did Apiqu Inc. accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
They’re early and answering. They principally use Jira to adjoin as well for bug fixes and troubleshooting. We also had weekly status update meetings as we got deeper into the devolvement phase of the project. The CTO was sometimes joined on calls by one or two other members of the team.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with Apiqu?
We’re very impressed with how fast they work while quiet delivering condition products and services. Apiqu Inc. is always ready to help us out. They’re very supportive.
What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?
On the interactions side of the project, we frequently had to ready them to reinforcement information to us almost how the project was tracking to budget.
Any advice for possible clients?
Be clear from the set in setting expectations. Make sure they apprehend how frequently you want them to adjoin on key issues.
