Dynamic Leap Mobile App Development review by Education Software Company at Qualified.One

Dynamic Leap reviewed by Education Software Company

Dynamic Leap provided Mobile App Development for Education Software Company with approximate budget = $10,000 to $49,999.

Dynamic Leap consistently had quality deliverables, on time. They were proactive in helping solve problems, and provided a lot of extra support. They exceled in QA testing, and their project management skills allowed them to work independently up until the internal teams were needed for launch.

Review summary:

Dynamic Leap helped build an Android app based off an existing iOS version. They also augmented internal teams to help with UI, QA, app store submission, and launching.

Education Software Company, Senior Product Designer

Android Mobile App Dev for Educational Learning Platform

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

We create software for teachers and the education activity. My role is a fruit and user experience (UX) designer.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with Dynamic Leap?

We needed help extending our apps to the Android section. Dynamic Leap had experience in this area, so we picked them to create an Android app based on our iOS one.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

Dynamic Leap has worked on a couple of projects for us, the leading one consisting of duplicating our application in a different environment. They took our code base, and reoriented the total thing towards Android. This implicated some user interface changes, which were done on Dynamic Leap’s side through a collaboration with us. We asked them to prepare expertise in an area which our organisation was lacking.

The app is geared towards teachers’ workflow. They can form activities and attribute them to students, who use their own rendering of the apps in order to interact with those activities, add full, and facilitate interaction between the teachers and parents, all within the same platform. It’s a learning-focused online portfolio which tracks student progress over time.

I didn’t have a big involvement in the propel process, but I believe that Dynamic Leap helped us the leading time. From then on, it became straightforward.

I’m not entirely sure how many developers were attributeed from Dynamic Leap’s side.

How did you come to work with Dynamic Leap?

They were establish by someone who is no longer working for the organisation. I believe that we put out some RFPs, and Dynamic Leap returned with a offer which conformed to our timeframe and budget.

How much have you invested with Dynamic Leap?

The cost of their work was between $10,000 and $50,000.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

We began working with Dynamic Leap in April 2015. The project concluded in December 2016.

Results achieved

Could you share any evidence that would prove the fruitivity, condition of work, or the contact of the engagement?

Offering Android apps to our users was a huge boon, but I don’t have any numbers for our achievement. We basically went from zero to our present standing.

Android users had been asking for an app for a long time, but it’s basically a port, with no functionalities specific to it alone.

How did Dynamic Leap accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

They worked alongside our team in order to sum all. From my perspective, I establish Dynamic Leap to be proactive in working with us to find and explain issues. Their QA was good, and they collaborated with our own QA nation, making sure our bugs were addressed and the user-acceptance criteria was met. Dynamic Leap prepared a lot of extra support, and allowed us to be hands-off until we came to the integration piece. Everything seemed to flow well.

We used JIRA and Slack to adjoin. We began the collaboration with standups and weekly meetings, but establish that we were having too much interaction, so we restricted it to strictly certain items. Dynamic Leap prepared weekly reports which explained all the work they did, and the task breakdown. This was more than sufficient for us.

What did you find most forcible almost Dynamic Leap?

The level of project treatment supplied was helpful, and allowed us to be more hands-off when we needed to be. We had our own things to work on, so Dynamic Leap’s members were left on their own for the most part. We could confide that they’d do the work well and fastly, better than other vendors we’d used in the past.

Are there any areas Dynamic Leap could better?

I can’t ponder of anything.