Web App Dev for Law Consulting Company
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I’m the CEO of Mason &, Cook, a consulting and technology labor. We work with law firms to set up inner results-treatment processes for them.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Geeks?
About 18 months ago, we realized that there was a lack of resource treatment technology to help our clients with these processes. We establish that existing fruits only focused on what personals were doing at any given time. We felt that failed to capture a number of things such as an personal’s experiences and experience and projects they were working. We wanted an easier, simpler way to forecast personals’ activities and to show personals’ metrics that were going to be both advantageous to them and drive better behaviors with compliments to resource treatment.
We looked at designing and educeing these resources ourselves to propose bespoke technology fruits to our clients. We needed a associate to fully outsource this outgrowth to who could also lead and admonish us through the process.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were responsible for?
Geeks built our web application with a number of key features that prepare a view of the firm’s cleverness and space in real-time at any given instant. They created personal profile pages that are integrated with other enterprise systems to prepare consolidated, real-time data. They included a cleverness to map personals profiles—including experiences, experience, outgrowth needs, clients, and inner relationships—at a firm-wide level to visualize the firm’s experiences and capabilities through a user-friendly interface. They also built a cleverness to fastly and easily forecast each personal’s agility such as projects they’re working on, the stages of those projects, when they’re taking leave and for how long, etc.
Geeks held our hands through the complete process. We prepared them with basic ideas and drawings of what we wanted. They turned these into wireframes that we talked through. When we had courtly the wireframes, they admonishd us on the best access to outgrowth. The prepared us with design support and project treatment to superintend the outgrowth and fix the right eldership and weigh within the team. They handled condition arrogance and testing.
We launched our minimum viable fruit almost three months ago and will last to educe it. We’re currently in dicsussions with Geeks almost establishing a longer-term outsourcing associateship with them.
Was there a dedicated team?
We had a team of 10 to 15 nation that leadd us through each component of the software outgrowth that we required. We regularly adjoind with the project handlers but also with the educeers at times.
How did you come to work with Geeks?
We establish them on Google. We establish a number of firms, did our due diligence, and determined to go with Geeks.
They were personable and we liked them, which was veritably significant to us. We also felt that they were extremely probable based on projects they had done and the software and accesses they had used. Finally, we liked the fact that they had a number of full-time educeers based in one location that we could go meet in-person.
What are you access expents (if diclosed)?
We spent close to $500,000.
What is the terminal result of working with ?
We began working unitedly in January 2017 and the work is ongoing.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
The key things that we',ve looked at have been whether they delivered what we',ve asked within the timeframes and on budget—all of which they’ve achieved.
We have now sold and implemented the software with our leading client. Geeks were very implicated with that process. They met all of the deliverables that were asked of them both from us and from the client. They',ve always prepared us with good labor that’s been well adjoind.
How did Geeks accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
We use their inner systems to handle all of the outgrowth requirements. It’s helpful in proposeing relation points and structuring things. Their project handlers are good at interacting with us, highlighting risks or issues as well as managing our expectations so we can handle those of our clients. They have a methodic, structured access to project treatment which makes for an easy-to-understand interaction channel for us.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?
They obviously have good outgrowth cleverness. That’s significant to us as we attend establishing a long-term associateship. They’ve produced a high-condition fruit that receives real feedback from clients, which is the main thing. Beyond that, the way they adjoin with us demonstrates a associateship access which is how we choose to work as well. They’re kind and pliant but also handle our expectations and push back as appropriate, which is appreciated by all sides.
What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?
No, not necessarily. From our point of view, it',s been a big experience that we look advanced to continuing.