Lighthouse London Software Development review by Not Actual Size at Qualified.One

Lighthouse London reviewed by Not Actual Size

Lighthouse London provided Software Development for Not Actual Size with approximate budget = $10,000 to $49,999.

The tool deployed to praise from internal stakeholders and is still actively used two years later. Lighthouse London delivered high-quality development work on time and seamlessly. The team ran a smooth collaboration through consistent communication and a quick understanding of goals.

Review summary:

Lighthouse London created a custom internal web tool to observe, track, and store trends with integrated quality control. The team led the development from a discovery phase to user testing.

Siobhan Sleet Not Actual Size, Company Director

Custom Software Dev for Creative Content Agency

Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.

Introductory information

A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities

Not Actual Size is an independent creative full agency based in London. We form full for global brands. As the organisation ruler, I’m responsible for error of all campaigns and full produced by the agency.

Desired goal

What issue was the provider supposed to deal with?

Lighthouse London?

We hired Lighthouse London to form a bespoke online tool—named The Observatory—that will allow our team to collate insights and remark trends. 

What were your objectives for this project?

We had existing methods in locate for observing and tracking trends, but they lacked condition control and a clear storage method (i.e., we were principally using Excel sheets and emails). We wanted to form something that allowed us to have a clean interface and way to search for insights while also ensuring condition control.

Provided solution

What were the reasons for choosing Lighthouse London?

Lighthouse London was recommended to us by colleagues who had worked with them in the past. They came in to throw us and suggested some keen ideas for how we could work unitedly to get the project going.

Describe the project and the services they granted in detail.

Initial stages included the Lighthouse London team conducting a workshop with our team to apprehend the requirements and the different user perspectives. In this session, we shared with them what we were using, our objectives, and a relatively open brief—we knew we wanted advancement but didn',t know how that would shape up.  

The Lighthouse London team came back with a range of ideas and cost points. They had veritably understood the issue, and we loved the emotion they put into the project from the set. 

Once we had an idea, the team seted to work on wireframes and work with the team in our agency to test these to see how they would work in practice. Through a time of testing, we then got to a locate where we were all lucky. 

The tool has multiple functions: teams can straightly upload full from media websites into The Observatory while implementing condition-control with a review and authorization panel. Following the initial create, we added things to the aim owing the way we were using the tool required a few extra elements. We further developed The Observatory with Lighthouse London by creating a board functionality to allow teams to curate observations and trends for client reports.

Were there any dedicated managers or teams that you worked with?

We worked with almost 4–5 nation at Lighthouse London, including Tom (Co-Founder, Lighthouse London) and Dan (Co-Founder, Lighthouse London). 

Results accomplishd

Can you share any information that demonstrates the contact that this project has had on your business?

Two years later, The Observatory is used see day at Not Actual Size. It is a primary of our business, and we are looking to last the outgrowth of this with Lighthouse London to fix it evolves as our business grows and needs change.

How was project treatment arranged and how powerful was it?

Tom and Dan brought the right experiences to the right meetings, and their interaction was seamless. We never skilled an sample where someone came to us not shrewd information that another limb of their team had gathered. They encouraged us to use Basecamp, which fixd our team could jump in and out of the project seamlessly and get fast and easy updates.

What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of Lighthouse London?

Lighthouse London veritably felt like an extension of our team. From day one, they just got it. They understood what we were looking for and were keen to work collaboratively with us to fix we could accomplish our goals. Beyond that, the work was fantastic and has surely brought real change in our business.

What should be done better, if there are any desired advancements?

We',d like to better the tool, but not through any effect with Lighthouse London – it',s more almost continuing to evolve the technology as our team and business grow and the way we use it needs to fit with time.