Toughlex Development review by Ad Technology Platform at Qualified.One

Toughlex reviewed by Ad Technology Platform

Toughlex provided Development for Ad Technology Platform with approximate budget = 50000.

toughlex’s resources eased the need for full-time hiring during the project, and they were knowledgeable and adaptive throughout the engagement. They could increase their team size to improve regular communication, but they delivered as expected and any delays were due to internal issues.

Review summary:

toughlex helped improve and update the frontend and backend of a software-as-a-service system, using C# for the backend and a JavaScript framework on the frontend.

alt
Ad Technology Platform, Group Director


Outsourced Dev Project for Ad Platform

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

We prepare an online advertising platform athwart 15–16 countries. The main outgrowth part of our operations is located in Slovenia, Belarus, and Poland, and our headquarters are in Copenhagen. I am a director within the organisation, responsible for fruit outgrowth, with a team of 35 nation.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with toughlex?

We needed to liberate more, and had limited hiring possibilities. We were hiring a lot of nation, but had a good occasion to fastly onboard a couple of developers through toughlex, which we took. At the time, we had a bunch of relatively little projects which could be outsourced. They were not risky for us as a organisation, in the general perception, so we were open to having them done by someone else.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

From the perspective of our fruit, there were a couple of submethods which needed to be rewritten. It was partially a facelift, but as a effect of it, some backend methods needed to be worked on as well. toughlex handled both, using C# for the backend and a JavaScript framework on the frontend.

The fruit is intended for outer use, but it’s not a nice part of our method. It’s kindred to self-labor banner treatment on the user part. It impacts other parts of the method, but toughlex wasn’t implicated with those.

What is the team dynamic?

toughlex was a little startup at the time, with perhaps 5 developers in total, but we did have a team lead for interaction. He came to our labor weekly or biweekly, for acceptancy reviews and programning. This was our main interaction channel. The director also brought along one of the senior developers. We also interacted through Skype on a daily basis. There were 3–4 developers working for us.

How did you come to work with toughlex?

One of their developers had worked on our fruit in the past, which was an significant detail for us. It made the interaction smoother, and ensured that—at littleest to some degree—they knew what our platform was, what technology stack it used, and what our work access was. I believe this paid off. toughlex was there, prompt to jump on our particular tasks, which was also significant. Their cost was also very good.

What are you access expents (if diclosed)?

The cost of their work was close to €50,000. [$60,000]

What is the terminal result of working with ?

We began working with toughlex in November 2015, and artistic in December 2016.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

Our access is a bit different, since we are selling a labor, and not a piece of software. We had to extend our space, and toughlex’s help reduced our hiring need at that time. It made things simpler, since we could onboard new developers without verity hiring them.

There were a couple of challenges from a UX perspective. We have an inner team which degoods standards and accomplishs reviews. Rather than toughlex doing something bad, it was a substance of our UX being in an unclear state. As a effect, the work took longer than we initially expected, but they liberateed what we expected in the end.

How did toughlex accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

We interacted well with the main team director and the senior developer. The interaction was constructive and direct to the point.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

They work in little iterations, and centre on liberateing each one, as well as on reviewing what is needed and adapting to that (rather than following a long program only to liberate something which wasn’t veritably required).

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

They could hire a couple of nation in order to prepare more customary interaction. We interfaced with a senior individual who covered the initial interaction, with a couple of juniors behind him. From our perspective, this was okay, but there could have been a more efficient timeline if there were more senior nation on board at the time. I believe that toughlex has changed since that time, so this may no longer be an effect.

Our key services

Score: 29667

Toughlex is a Lithuania-based IT company founded in 2015, that partners with companies in need of software development services. We believe that only working together with our clients can ensure the most efficient route to creating software that satisfyin ...

Avg project size: $93333   |   Reviews: 3   |   Portfolio: 18 works

alt
Toughlex Web Development