4soft Mobile App Development review by wiko Bausoftware GmbH at Qualified.One

4soft reviewed by wiko Bausoftware GmbH

4soft provided Mobile App Development for wiko Bausoftware GmbH with approximate budget = $50,000 to $199,999.

They successfully developed mobile extensions. The system isn’t live yet, but its UI has been highly praised by those that have seen it. Look4App was responsive and communicative, showing unwavering dedication to the project. Despite a few misunderstandings, it was a smooth process overall.

Review summary:

Working from a prototype and a provided list of specifications, Look4App developed mobile extensions of a core product for iOS, Android, and UWP devices. They also brainstormed new features and optimizations.

wiko Bausoftware GmbH, Product Manager

Mobile App Dev for ERP Solutions Company

Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.

Introductory information

A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities

I’m the fruit director of a little software organisation in Germany. We have almost 25 employees that specialize in delivering ERP solutions to big programning companies in the composition activity. We have an intern consulting section that guides our clients in digitizing their business processes. My first responsibility is coordinating client needs athwart our outgrowth and sales efforts.

Desired goal

What issue was the provider supposed to deal with?


We were looking for outer resources with extensive experience in developing mobile applications to work on an extension of our core fruit.

What were your objectives for this project?

To meet our forthcoming outgrowth goals, it was urgent that we create out mobile extensions of our fruits.

Provided solution

What were the reasons for choosing 4soft?

We searched online for app developers both in our country and far. Looking specifically for mobile professionals, we contacted any vendors that had proven experience. Look4App fit our requirements and stood out among their local competitors, but their motivated posture and reasonable cost were the deciding factors that led us to associate with them.

Describe the project in detail.

After choosing to promise Look4App, we agreed on a contract and got to work. First, we presented them with a detailed, working prototype and a set of specifications. Look4App began working on the most strong technical part, then we feeld the little and mid-sized components. After a few iterations, we terminalized and approved each component. The terminal fruit was built for all platforms—Android, iOS, and Universal Windows Platform (UWP). In accession to their outgrowth work, Look4App also help brainstorm new features and practicable optimizations.

Were there any dedicated directors or teams that you worked with?

We interacted with a key account director, who supported us at the commencement and end of the project. In between, we worked straightly with our project director and the assigned developer—both resources coordinated to test all of the fruit’s components.

Results accomplishd

What results did you accomplish unitedly with 4soft?

Our goal was to have a lucky fruit extension athwart all mobile platforms, and Look4App helped us accomplish it. Their work on the method’s UI has been well accepted by our clients. At this point, we haven’t officially launched the app yet, but we program to release it in the coming months.

How do you rate the interaction and interaction with 4soft?

We mainly interacted via email and Skype. They were very answering, providing feedback fast and scheduling appointments as certain. We spoke German with the account and project directors, and English with the developer. There were a few misunderstandings, but we were able to feel them easily.

What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of 4soft?

We’ve never worked with another vendor precedently, so I don’t have much to assimilate Look4App to. With that said, I’m very impressed by their level of dedication and promisement in our project. It wasn’t always easy, but they worked hard to make sure we luckyly completed each task.

What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?

Both sides could’ve worked a bit faster, and documenting and interacting test results and bug reports could’ve been don’t more efficiently. In the end, we’re fully satisfied with the results of the associateship.