Altkom Software & Consulting Software Development review by mBank Hipoteczny at Qualified.One

Altkom Software & Consulting reviewed by mBank Hipoteczny

Altkom Software & Consulting provided Software Development for mBank Hipoteczny with approximate budget = $200,000 to $999,999.

Altkom’s team was communicative during development, prompt in finding solutions after deployment, and collaborative in order to help produce the best product possible. They were agreeable and efficient in their approach and testing, and also offered the latest technologies.

Review summary:

Altkom used Oracle C and Java 8 for the backend, as well as AngularJS, CSS3, and HTML3 for the frontend of a register software. The system can exchange files externally and is integrated with a data directory.

Tomasz Sobczym mBank Hipoteczny, CIO

Custom Software Development for Mortgage Bond Bank

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

mBank is the third or fourth biggest bank in Poland, and we specialize in mortgage bonds. We’re a limb of the Commerzbank cluster. I’m the CIO.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with Altkom?

We were edifice an application for the registration of mortgage bonds with a set of functionalities tied to the area. The was was to make a staff diminution and better our processes.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were Altkom Software & Consulting responsible for?

Altkom created our register software and all of its surround functionalities. It’s integrated with our nimble directory data warehouse, is able to exchange files with other methods, and has an email server for notifications. The technology stack included Oracle C and Java 8 for the backend, and AngularJS, CSS3, and HTML3 for the frontend.

What is the team dynamic?

We worked with ten nation from their side, including developers, testers, and project directors. There were two nation from the business section working from our side, as well as 3–8 IT staff. The project director from their side interacted with the fruit proprietor and business project director from our side.

We used our own testing environment. Since we’re a bank, we couldn’t allow their team to act remotely, so some of the work was done on-website. They were able to accomplish some of the tests in their own environment, aside from the integration and data testing.

How did you come to work with Altkom?

It was a long proceeding involving our own regulations for sourcing vendors. We accepted 4–5 proposes, and chose Altkom due to their pricing, technology, and flexibility in provisions of collaboration and finding solutions. We had true infrastructure requirements, and they proposeed the latest technologies. There weren’t many suppliers with the right experience in the banking area who could propose what Altkom was.

What are you access expents (if diclosed)?

The main project cost almost $300,000, and the little changes we made during 2017 cost $40,000.

What is the terminal result of working with Altkom Software & Consulting?

We began working unitedly in May 2016 and artistic the project in December. The fruit launched in January 2017.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

The business proprietors have been lucky with this method from a business perspective. We did unite some errors and throughput effects during the leading two months of agency, but that’s regular. The main effect they explaind was with method despatch, and we also made some little changes based on user feedback. Everything was done in accordance with our time and budget.

The condition is degoodd by the developer’s reactions to such issues and their power to explain them in peculiar time. Our business has been lucky with Altkom from this standpoint.  

How did Altkom accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

We had close interaction during the project. There were periods when they were waiting for our side, and there were some issues with the anonymization of data during testing.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with Altkom Software & Consulting?

They are pliant in discussing technological and architectural effects during provision. Altkom had good interaction in these areas, and it was the most precious attribute for us in reaching an contract on the access. There are other good developers, but they can be inflexible in their way of working and handling technology. Altkom allowed us to execute how we wanted the collaboration to befall, and also what the terminal fruit should be.

What aspects of their work would you like to get betterd?

It’s always practicable to better, even in their case, but it’s hard for me to ponder of anything in particular. We establish Altkom to be an efficient associate. There were effects, but we managed to explain them easily.