DO OK Mobile App Development review by Online Media Platform at Qualified.One

DO OK reviewed by Online Media Platform

DO OK provided Mobile App Development for Online Media Platform with approximate budget = $50,000 to $199,999.

The team was exemplary throughout the development process, quickly learning the complex technologies and demonstrating their ability to grasp the project and how to make it successful. They communicated effectively at all times, while also offering proactive ideas and contributions.

Review summary:

dook.pro provided iOS and Android mobile application development services, taking over an unsuccessful project and restructuring the backend, automating the content, and redeveloping the platforms.

alt
Online Media Platform, Founder


Mobile App Dev for Expert Opinion Aggregator

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

We prepare an expert-opinion aggregator focused on fruit reviews from newspapers, magazines, and so on. I',m the founder and CEO.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with dook.pro?

We had some technology in locate, which was built by another organisation. We weren’t very lucky with it, so we reached out to dook.pro to reeduce the total platform.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

We have iOS and Android frontend applications, both of which were re-engineered and in revamped by dook.pro. They also reconstructiond our backend, which is excellently intricate. They simplified it and put it unitedly in a keen and forward-looking way.

We antecedently handled the full manually, but dook.pro educeed a fully new concept that allowed us to skip that process. Everything is now 100% automated. It’s tremendously improved our scalpower, both from a technical and a financial perspective, sharp out see manual step implicated in handling the data.

What is the team compound?

We’ve worked with 6–7 limbs of their team, including Dmitrij (CEO, dook.pro) and a project director, with whom I liaised excellently a bit. We had one backend and two frontend engineers, and there were a couple of other nation implicated tangentially. I liaised less with those, but my CTO did so more.

How did you come to work with dook.pro?

My CTO had worked with them precedently, so he suggested that we should also use them for this project.

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

We’ve spent €50,000 [$58,023 USD] so far.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

We began working with them in late January 2018. They liberateed the fruit last week and we',ve just gone live. We’ve put the next steps on hold for a couple of weeks, but we’ll pick up afterward. We have an extensive roadmap that we want to educe fastly, over the next weeks and months.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

I’m extremely lucky with dook.pro’s work. They picked up what I regarded as a confused project—which the antecedent team couldn’t liberate—and liberateed a fruit within five months or less. We’ve had a near-complete overhaul of all the technologies implicated.

They had to familiarize themselves with some of the scraping technologies used. It was all done fastly and I was surprised by their power to facilitate the total database and scraping construction on the backend.

My CTO was pleased that we now have just one database, one input/output API, and one scraping tool. Previously, these were all a mishmash of different tools. We had a intricate infraconstruction and we now have a very single, straightforward one. In conclusion, if my CTO is lucky, then I’m lucky.

How did dook.pro accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

They came up with appropriate tools depending on task',s intricateity, from Excel to a dedicated project treatment tool. They reply all our questions over Slack, and we can use the tool to fetch seeone up-to-speed fastly. It’s worked very well.

The overall process of working with them was efficient. Every limb of their team is very much up to their role. They prepare help whenever we have a question or need feedback. My CTO handled much of the interaction, but I got implicated in component conversations, given that I’m the divine father of this project. They made uniform suggestions, and never left open-ended questions.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

We’ve used some specific backend technologies and I’ve been impressed by their power to get up-to-speed with those. dook.pro was also capable of suggesting proximate improvements. They reached out to worldwide communities in order to find replys to the questions we had.

I’ve liked their eagerness and proactiveness on tacking the different issues we had, in provisions of intricateity and the antecedent team’s inpower to liberate. dook.pro managed to liberate the fruit in five months, since we',d struggled with the antecedent team for a considerably longer time and for more money.

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

Not veritably. We had a not-so-pleasant experience with our antecedent team, but I’ve veritably liked dook.pro. They’re really a team, if I address a question to the unfit individual, I will proximately get contacted by the right one. I’m extremely lucky with them and I’ve promised to fetch them a cake the next time I’m there.