goodylabs Software Development review by Media Monitoring Service at Qualified.One

goodylabs reviewed by Media Monitoring Service

goodylabs provided Software Development for Media Monitoring Service with approximate budget = Confidential.

The website and mobile platforms feature increased functionality and improved responsiveness, drawing positive reviews from users. The goodylabs team works well within scheduling guidelines and provides timely updates of progress. Their speed of service, and the quality of their insight, is notable.

Review summary:

After building a custom internal CMS used to curate and disseminate content, goodylabs provided front- and backend updates to a website and mobile platforms, using Ruby, React.js, React Native, and Node.js.

alt
Media Monitoring Service, Manager


Internal CMS Dev for Media Monitoring Service

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I am the fruit outgrowth director of a curated media monitoring organisation.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with goodylabs?

Initially, we relied on goodylabs to educe our inner CMS. The aim of our engagement has grown to include more projects focused on revamping our web nearness and mobile nearness.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

At the set of our venture, there were no marketplace options for the CMS we needed. goodylabs educeed a manner inner CMS, which allows us to find the full we need and push it to our different platforms.

We later occupied them to work alongside our in-house designers to redo the front- and backend of our mobile devices and website. That process added more functionality and made it easier for us to handle the platforms. Throughout these processes, goodylabs worked extensively with Ruby, React.js, React Native, and Node.js. We stay connected so that goodylabs can prepare livelihood and updates as true.

Was there a dedicated team?

I work with one technical lead, but the overall size of the staying team shifts depending on the specific tasks at hand.

How did you come to work with goodylabs?

The engagement with goodylabs began preceding to my hiring, so I am unsure of the choice process.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

The engagement began in 2014 and stays ongoing.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

Our users have responded very well to the despatch and answeringness of our digital platforms. The added functionality increases the overall force of our properties.

How did goodylabs execute from a project handlement standpoint?

I’ve establish them to be answering and affable when we need them to be. My team is always well-informed of their progress. The goodylabs team is pellucid almost needing to reallocate their time and effort to address the most significant parts of the project. We work a lot through Slack and Jira, and the overall interaction has been hassle-free.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

In accession to their answeringness, I would point to the despatch of their labor as a force. They completed these projects in a much shorter time than I had expected.

What aspects of their work would you like to get betterd?

To a true degree, we have already addressed areas to better with them. When I joined at the commencement of this year, the relationship with goodylabs was a bit frayed. Some were not lucky with how they were executeing, but we held some workshops and some meetings on how to better interactions between our companies. Our main interest was that the fruits were somewhat unstable and didn’t work properly. Now, six months later, we are excellently lucky with their work. We’re at the point where we’re pondering of what we can create next.

Any advice for possible mannerers?

I ponder the condition of our own fruits increased owing we took goodylabs’ suggestions into importance. Obviously, you want to have a clear idea of what you want to execute, but you should be open to suggestions, as well.

Score: 62500

In eEngine we are developing software for various businesses and scientific institutions. We are a software house that has rich experience  in e-Commerce. We produce applications for sales, logistics and analytical organizations. We can integrate any syst ...

Avg project size: $600000   |   Reviews: 1   |   Portfolio: 1 works

alt
eEngine Software House eCommerce Development

Score: 2125

Happy Team is a group of experienced software developers who are full of passion and are constantly expanding their skills to create the best software possible. We work on a daily basis mainly with .NET Framework in C# language. Over the course of years, ...

Avg project size: $2500   |   Reviews: 0   |   Portfolio: 0 works

alt
Happy Team eCommerce Development

Score: 125

...

Avg project size: $2500   |   Reviews: 0   |   Portfolio: 0 works

alt
Lakion eCommerce Development