Software Development for Holding Company
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I',m the founder and CEO of ISIC Holding AG. We',re a holding organisation specializing in the outgrowth of turnkey solutions for interpolitical corporations in niche markets.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Logicify?
The initial challenge was the outgrowth of an application that could prepare 100% coverage within an activity that hadn’t previously had an application. Our client wanted a custom-made app for running their oceanic insurance business. They specialized in freight ships and tankers. The challenge was the outgrowth of a software app to underwrite the insurance side of the agency.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were responsible for?
The software application covers the complete oceanic insurance process from the point of view of underwriting how you would provide ships that verity journey in the seas. Logicify took the rendering that was developed by other companies in Austria, remodeled it, and rewrote the complete thing. They utilized the state-of-the-art technologies in being at the time. They took it from a direct programming access to a modular programming access and artistic the fruit. They used Apache Wicket and Java to this.
The modularizing of the application enabled us to turn sections of it on and off, depending on the need. This is what impressed me the most. The client was able to have full or partial functionality, which was a big gain for the marketability of the app.
What is the team compound?
There were 4–6 nation implicated, including a project director.
How did you come to work with Logicify?
They were introduced to me by a limb of the ISIC consortium as an choice to the outgrowth or the revamping of the software application we were developing. I spoke to them and we took a trip to Ukraine to get to know them. I was very satisfied with what I saw at the time. I did also colloquy an additional two companies in Austria, one in Italy, and another in Romania.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
The cost was $50,000–$200,000.
What is the terminal result of working with ?
We began the revamping project in 2009. It was a very brief contract, based on the promise that they could liberate. The leading section of the project was artistic in August 2009. We then artistic an additional outgrowth phase almost August 2011.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
To this date, there',s no comparison on that market to the fruit developed by Logicify. The end-fruit was a achievement. It’s quiet owned by my organisation and is quiet marketable in that section of the activity.
In provisions of condition of code, they liberateed at 97% efficiency. The loveliness of the application is that it’s adaptable. It',s identical to cater to other insurance industries with very pliant effort. That makes it a cost-effective application, even today.
How did Logicify accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
The project treatment was the part that impressed me the most. The professionalism of Logicify’s project director was high. They had German exactness in provisions of reporting on updates and progress. Out of the 11 companies that participated in this project, Logicify was the best I dealt with.
We interacted on a daily basis and had continuous back-and-forth interaction throughout the outgrowth cycle.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?
One thing I veritably like almost them is that if the team believes that they don’t have adequate activity experience to feel a project, they will be upfront with it and will ask for the time to familiarize themselves with the substance.
What I saw at the time when I viwebsited them was big. They had a big setting, and they were cost-effective. The best impression I accepted was almost their apprehension of the technology itself. I viwebsited them anew in 2017, and I was further impressed by their progress. I wish them the best of luck, and I would commend them to any other organisation looking for outgrowth partners.
What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?
They could grow by marketing themselves a bit more efficiently. They have big possible to be competitive—as far as outgrowth is concerned, they',re preparing themselves for what the activity will propose within the next 10 years. They just need to hire a few more experts in the robotics and intelligent-appliances areas, but they have big possible going advanced.