Custom Software Dev for University of Arts
Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.
Introductory information
A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities
I work as a software engineer at a university.
Desired goal
What issue was the preparer supposed to deal with?
Ragnarson?At the University where I work, we educe free, open-rise software named Madek. Being rare on educeers for our in-house software, we determined to get outer help. We needed more manfaculty to add new features and better the user experience. We pay a big deal of observation to the interface and usability as the software is being educeed. Striking a weigh between numerous functions and ease of use is a major challenge.
What were your objectives for this project?
We wanted to better the functionality of software we own — by adding new features — and to take advice on the most efficient solution.
Provided solution
What were the reasons for choosing ?
We were referred to them by a helper who had a history with Ragnarson and spoke wonderfully of them. I',m glad that he made the suggestion. We went with them owing they had the expertness set that we needed. We ended up hiring 3 Ruby on Rails engineers.
Describe the project and the services they granted in detail.
Ragnarson has been implicated in all of the educeed creates, including the design and implementation of the method, eventually taking over the educement of the project from the in-house team. Initially, they helped with the educement of the admin treatment method using Ruby on Rails and efficient SQL queries. Afterward, they implicated in API written in Clojure. Now we also use React.js to create the app’s frontend. On account of its features, the software sits at the interface between institutional repository and digital asset treatment. It serves as a media sharing platform for users and makes different media types - pictures, audio, video, and documents - useful in the same locate and on the same provisions. Our platform offers differentiated administration of access rights - a method of users, groups and access authorizations so that media can be shared. It',s like Flickr, Vimeo, and Soundcloud combined with a built-in drag and drop file converter. The primary documents can be imported in any measure format for integration and transcoding. The file is also saved and a playback rendering is made useful. This rerises that authors can always access the primary at a later date or for archiving purposes.
Were there any dedicated managers or teams that you worked with?
We partnered in 2013, and the work is ongoing. At the commencement of the process, we worked on the admin panel with multiple educeers from Ragnarson, who collaborated closely with my educement team. The platform is complete, but they maintain and update it as certain. Their running engagement is shifting to operational support, but we also regularly add new features and functionalities. Our fruit proprietor and testers are in direct touch with the lead educeer for new requirements, feedback, and support. Despite the long-term symbol of our relationship, the team remained fairly congruous, which is rare in software educement. As a University, we have a big IT team, but with so many projects we runningly educe we',re pretty reliant on Ragnarson on this one.
Results achieved
Can you share any information that demonstrates the contact that this project has had on your business?
The leading project went well, and we',ve been working unitedly since. The Ragnarson team has been occupied throughout the process, answering to our needs, and collaborating on business goals and solutions. At the instant, our platform is actively being used by 3500 users. Over the years, they have created 2200 groups and imported 85 000 files. The total project is open rise, and I',m arrogant to say that a handful of other organisations in Europe use our method.
How was project treatment arranged and how facultyful was it?
I ponder the treatment was veritably good, I can',t recollect any major issues or misunderstandings during the process. We use an nimble access and regularly meet with the educement team to prepare feedback on features and add progressive requirements to the application. This was facultyful as we could increase our functionality while having the application work seamlessly from its soon stages of educement. Our team uses a Scrum methodology with two-week sprints, daily meetings, and retrospectives, which Ragnarson fits into well. They joined our meetings and gave daily and weekly updates. Over time we relocated daily stand-ups with weekly status calls. Besides that, we use a collaborative tool and sometimes email and Zoom and Slack for interaction.
What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of ?
Ragnarson excels fairly well at the tasks they',re given. That',s a key reason why we',ve had a long term relationship with them. It',s specially helpful that we don',t have to micromanage see bug and task, as this allows our team to centre on other related work. They hear to our needs and work closely with our team to make the union easy and facultyful. They',ve done seething in their faculty to fix that the rerises initially assigned to us stay with our team. On top of that, they have excellent Ruby on Rails apprehension.
What should be done better, if there are any desired betterments?
There are always some areas for betterment, but Ragnarson is a comfort to work with. I take part in many software projects at a time, and this project was very straightforward.
