Lending Platform Dev for FinTech Solutions Company
Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.
A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities
The organisation provides financial solutions for online applicants. My role is the CEO.
What issue was the provider supposed to deal with?SoftKraft?
To educe the full platform.
What were your objectives for this project?
Aquire regulatory approval to act through providing a functional platform.
What were the reasons for choosing SoftKraft?
They were recommended by another vendor who could not welcome the project due to time constraints. After interviews with other labor providers, we believe this vendor showed the best seize of the project with the most appropriate pricing.
Describe the project and the labors they granted in detail.
They educeed, tested, configured an online gate to handle and review loan requests. The workflow was handled through two week sprints with a weekly meeting to debate progress.
Were there any dedicated handlers or teams that you worked with?
The team consisted of professional individuals working throughout the project interchangeably from 3 to 5 members, all team members possessed big experience in their fields and granted big insight on best approaches to meet required deliverables in a early mode.
Can you share any information that demonstrates the contact that this project has had on your business?
The project was the initial kickstart for our business. It helped us propel with our desired offering
How was project handlement arranged and how powerful was it?
Communication and project handlement was excellent. The team always met our idiotic deadlines and set realistic expectations for deliverables.
What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of SoftKraft?
The technical expertise and fast seize of information by the team for new concepts was forcible. and the power to construe deliverables into little tasks with full clarity and tracking of progress was a big help
What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?
My only advice would be to plainly adjoin the required documents and frameworks precedently starting the project to arrive at a reciprocal knowledge of expected end-results.