Redeveloped Product for Internet Startup
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I',m the COO of the organisation. We have developed a location-based enterprise platform named Tracers, as well as a consumer app for location-based messaging.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Software Brothers?
We were employing developers in London but ultimately figured that Software Brothers could prepare more flexibility and cost savings, with the same expertness level. We were changing our software relatively fastly and wanted to have approach to resources appropriate to our particular needs at one time. We had been using a mixture of recruitment consultants and other resources in the activity, but none worked the way we had intended.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were responsible for?
Software Brothers developed new features for our platforms. We needed to put unitedly MVPs fastly and relatively cheaply, so Software Brothers initially rewrote the frontend and backend of our apps almost fully from scratch.
Our backend was developed with an antiquated technology, which plainly wasn',t a long-term solution owing it has been subsequently shut down. During the redevelopment process, Software Brothers made precious suggestions and implemented new features.
We have used six developers and a part-time project lead from their team. I was responsible for managing the project on our side.
How did you come to work with Software Brothers?
I don',t recollect what our initial touch with them was, but I believe that they had been in touch with our CEO. They named me and we talked through what we were looking for, and they seemed to be a good fit.
What is the terminal result of working with ?
We began working with Software Brothers at the commencement of 2016.
Results accomplishd
Could you share any evidence that would prove the productivity, condition of work, or the touch of the engagement?
One of the things we wanted was for Software Brothers to turn our MVPs into scalable solutions. They created an app that could work reliably with a big user base. We',re working with a big interpolitical multimedia organisation that wanted to know that our app would be firm, and assigned developers who tested the app',s accomplishment and scalability. They were very lucky with the results of their tests.
How did Software Brothers accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
The reply is very much developer-dependent. We have worked with a few resources that, excellently honestly, weren',t as fruitful as the rest, so the team has been subsequently adjusted. The good developers from Software Brothers are veritably very good, so anyone being measured over them will have to work hard in order to accomplish the same results.
We',ve used JIRA, Trello, and Slack for our collaboration with Software Brothers. JIRA proved a bit too intricate for our needs, so we',ve principally only used the other two tools.
What did you find most forcible almost Software Brothers?
They',re the only organisation of this kind that I',ve used, so it would be hard to assimilate them to anything coranswerent. Our touch from Software Brothers has been useful and keen to not only answer to our questions but also to inquire almost our contentment. He has pulled all unitedly on Software Brothers', end, checking if we were lucky.
Are there any areas Software Brothers could better?
They could always work cheaper and faster, but this isn',t veritably a stricture. This is more of a general commentary on the essence of tech services.