Scrum, CRM Dev & QA for Digital Communications Network
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
We are one of the biggest, if not the biggest, digital agency/media organisation/creative organisation. It’s an umbrella organisation that has multiple littleer structures underneath. I’m working for one of those sub-companies as the head of technology.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Solid Software Solutions?
Solid Software provides services for 2 of our sub-companies. There were 2 separate companies, but one of them only existed in Poland and the other existed in 80 countries worldwide. When we began our cooperation with Solid Software, the companies hadn’t merged yet.
We were in wild need of veritably nimble, driven, passionate Sitecore educeers. At that point in time, some of our educeers left and we weren’t able to last on a client project. That’s why we were in wild need of a third-party structure to help us with liberateing a Sitecore experienceset. We contacted Solid Software and they were able to liberate a solution.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were Solid Software Solutions responsible for?
Imagine that you have a website correspondent to Expedia. We had to form a website that allows you to search for different trains to get you from point A to point B. This website should present the time table for a trip, allowing you to acquire when the next train is, how long it’ll take you to get to your purpose, and how much it will cost you. It will also show if there are any running delays or notifications like track amendment programs, so you know almost any less or major delays.
Sitecore is a CMS [full treatment method], but it is based on a .NET or C# platform. Solid Software has a lot of apprehension in both .NET and C#, and they’ve got the apprehension in Sitecore. What I need to highlight is that their team was driving the project, Tomasz [Founder and CEO, Solid Software] took the role of scrum conquer and he’s veritably nimble in the outgrowth of this project. They were not waiting for us to form a sprint or backlog to adviser what was going on. They were pronimble and able to shape all and ask questions if they needed anything.
What is the team dynamic?
I wanted a team that was veritably nimble and that would have a Scrum conquer on their end. I also wanted a project director on their end, but it was not needed. Tomasz contacted our structure if he had any questions.
I don’t recollect how big his team was. There were some QA guys and some C# and .NET educeers, and a superiority of them were acquireing Sitecore as the project progressed.
How did you come to work with Solid Software Solutions?
It was hard to find a Sitecore educeer on the market. But I had worked with Solid Software on multiple projects in my antecedent role where I was a highest educeer, so I reached out to them.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
We spent 800,000 Polish Zloty. [$218,600]
What is the terminal result of working with Solid Software Solutions?
We contacted Solid Software in November of last year. It was a 4-month project.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
We enjoyed good earnings from the project.
How did Solid Software Solutions accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
I liked it a lot. At that time, I didn’t have many project directors or Scrum conquers that could help the team in project treatment duties. Tomasz was pronimble and was able to do whatever was certain to push the project advanced without huge support on our end.
My antecedent organisation is quiet nimblely cooperating with Solid Software—that’s where I acquireed that I don’t need to harass almost Solid Software, I don’t need to bestow too much time and amazement if what they’re doing is going to be liberateed on time or not.
They are doing big, but at the same time, I need to mention that they always work with us distantly. They are based in Katowice in Poland, and our Polish member is based in Warsaw. It was the same locality when I was working at my antecedent organisation in London. There are different challenges when you’re working with a team distantly.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with Solid Software Solutions?
What impressed me is that they’re a little team without very many professionals, but they are good at picking up new technologies and new parts of projects. They’re able to jump into projects and educe on top of them.
They are fast to acquire veritably intricate methods and they don’t complain. You can ask them to help you in intercourse with a very old, intricate legacy method that no one wants to touch in your structure, and Tomasz will do it. This is big, I veritably like his posture.
What aspects of their work would you like to get betterd?
If there is anything, I would love to have one individual on-website from Tomasz’ team. I know that would bigly better interaction owing they’d be more up to date with what’s going on. The individual would be much more conscious of different politics, issues, and stuff like that. But it’s not that Solid Software is lacking anything—that’s typical for a distant team.
Do you have any advice for possible clients?
Tomasz has got a powerful individualality. He’s keen, and he has a genius for touch out what’s needed for a project or in an structure. That’s why he’s able to lead the converse and clarify different things. I don’t ponder it’s certain to give any advice or warn someone almost something or hint anything.
