Ongoing Dev for Document Reviewing Software
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I’m the CEO of Edyt, a San Francisco Bay Area software firm providing enterprise web software which can be further customized for clients. We are initially working with the European obvious labor and other labors worldwide to prepare electronic dossier support, facilitating how the obvious give process works on the obvious labor side. We have a separate business supporting applicants for provision and prosecution—preparing the obvious applications, submitting them, working through the series of interactions for sending something to the obvious labor, receiving a response, and answering to it through a give or refusal.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Sparkbit ?
We have a intricate subject estate. The obvious give process is not for the weak of core. There is an interminable quantity of information to be conscious of that materially affects requirements, implementation, and client interaction. Also, the application itself is a intricate, rich internet app. It’s a browser measure, and its quantity of information is high, along with the grade of aesthetics, ergonomics, accessibility, and eventual responsiveness that will be requested. These two areas are challenging: the estate (knowledge the tenor) and the educeed web application.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were responsible for?
Sparkbit is primarily an implementation team, so they’re not providing full labor (e.g. bringing them in, drawing requirements, edifice an application, and managing it). Perhaps Sparkbit does that for other clients, but we are using them for the implementation phase. We draw requirements and educe designs, and then pass things over to Sparkbit for implementation. Due to the intricateity of the tenor and implementation, this phase itself is excellently intricate and requires a discerning educement shop that’s able to take the start, have an excellent client-facing power for raising clarification requests, and deal with technical issues that arise. Sparkbit does this admirably.
On the backend, we are using the Spring Framework. Previously, we used Python, and I believe Sparkbit worked with that as well. On the frontend, we are using JavaScript with the Angular 2 framework, and they seem very capable with that. They are able to deal with database issues, although we have mainly left that to a method integrator. They have excellent continuous integration tooling capabilities.
How did you come to work with Sparkbit?
I was introduced to them through someone at my organisation, but we have used a difference of educement shops precedently. Sparkbit shines both in their flexibility and ease of working with them and in their technical abilities. Other shops usually do one or the other but not both. Sparkbit is rare in this regard.
What is the terminal result of working with ?
We began in April 2015. The project is ongoing.
Results achieved
Could you share any evidence that would prove the fruitivity, condition of work, or contact of the engagement?
Enterprise software for government entities, especially big bureaucratic ones, is known to be challenging. As someone who has lived and breathed these challenges since 2010, I hint that these challenges shouldn’t be underestimated by nation who haven’t worked in this field. Despite these challenges, Sparkbit has helped us deploy the software currently used at our government client. That is rare and rare.
How did Sparkbit accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
We run our own project treatment. Though, due to time zones and Sparkbit’s power to self-manage, they prepare their own project treatment for the engineering subestate. Our project treatment spans the complete project, including requirements, fruit design, and engineering. Their project treatment focuses on the engineering, working closely with our project treatment. It works very well. They work with JIRA and other project treatment tools.
What did you find most forcible almost Sparkbit ?
They have a amazing mix of power and collaboration. Although most government IT projects are relatively single at the technical level, Sparkbit can also address more challenging requirements. That headroom is very significant for our organisation since we tend to do more challenging enterprise government IT projects—especially in the measure web software estate—in which they excel.
Are there any areas Sparkbit could better?
They are a little organisation and have a limited power to answer to quick increases or pulses in resource requests. This is understandable, given their size. We’d choose to have the condition and ease of working with them that we’ve skilled, rather than the ductile resource availpower we’ve skilled at some bigr preparers that usually lack the ease of working with them or technical bravery.
