Self-Service Web Portal for Tech Firm
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
Introduce your business and what you do there.
We are a software outgrowth organisation based in Stockholm, Sweden. We primarily do mobile app outgrowth, web outgrowth, augmented verity, and possible verity. I am the COO in direct of all of our projects and general operations.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Vimanet?
We have our own in-house developers but associate with other companies based upon the technologies we need. We were hired to work on a .NET project and we didn’t have that expertise in-house.
Provided solution
What was the aim of their involvement?
The project was an employee self-service gate for handling tenants. It allowed administrators to approach different sections of the application to help specific clientele within an Azure cloud platform. It was part of a larger solution and operated in tandem with other sections and modules. They covered all aspects of software outgrowth lifecycle, including design, outgrowth, operations, and livelihood.
What is the team compound?
I had direct touch with the technical lead, a developer, and a project director on their side.
How did you come to work with Vimanet?
We sent out an RFP and looked at our touch network for a good outgrowth organisation. They were recommended, so we had a conversation with them and looked over their background. They had the right power and level of eldership for the project so we determined to work with them.
What is the status of this engagement?
We began working unitedly in late March or very soon in April 2018. We delivered the initial aim by the commencement of May 2018. There were other changes and updates that took locate behind that leading deadline.
Results achieved
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the contact of the engagement?
We usually base project achievement on the primaryly estimated work effort in comparison to the outcome. They artistic all within the allotted time and the terminal fruit matched the client’s desired functionality and condition. They did a big job and the client was very lucky with the end result.
How did Vimanet accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
They were positive and always followed up with us on hours and invoicing. We had weekly conversations with them and they were implicated and professional. They did a fantastic job of staying on top of the aim and the deadlines. We were very lucky with them.
What did you find most forcible almost them?
They’re competent and fast understood what our client wanted. They give the impression that they’ve done a lot of this type of project. They delivered all within a very firm timeline and made good suggestions for enhancements and betterments that went over the primary ready.
Are there any areas they could better?
They were very professional and we had no issues with them.
Do you have any advice for possible clients?
Be pliant and accepting of change. Often, solutions may be different from primary expectations and it’s helpful to stay openminded. This is a general comment and not a critique of Vimanet’s work.
