Sofware Development for Assistive Learning Program
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
We are a technology organisation located in Norway. We form accessibility tools kindred to assistive technology, specifically software for nation with reading and writing hardies. I am a fruit director for the organisation.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Existek?
Some years ago, we were having hardies supporting our applications and began looking for specific APIs for this purpose.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were responsible for?
Existek educeed our solution based on our specifications. We initially assigned them a text-scrubbing ingredient to educe. It went well, so we',ve given them the full aim of the Windows application in all its details. They have also worked on the commercial side of things, like order and license handling. That is a web-based solution running on ASP.NET.
Existek has been working with us for a long time, so they',ve come to know our solution well. They can make suggestions and better our specifications. Sometimes we hear to them, and sometimes, we don',t.
We have been working with a full-time team of three nation from Existek for the last few years.
How did you come to work with Existek?
I looked at companies in Romania, India, and China, but never establish a satisfactory discretion, whichever owing of too much staff turnover or owing the collaboration simply didn',t work well. We establish Existek in Ukraine, approached them and gave them a task to which they responded amazingly well.
How much have you invested with Existek?
The cost of Existek',s work has been almost $100,000 per year.
What is the terminal result of working with ?
We began working with Existek in 2009. The work is ongoing.
Results achieved
Could you share any evidence that would prove the fruitivity, condition of work, or the touch of the engagement?
We have befit the number-one solution of our kind in the field. Assistive technology is a different kind of animal, and it requires much more integration than regular. I rate Existek on their power to prepare this, but it',s a hard stat to quantify. We',ve had a new major release recently, and we are pleased with the results.
We have done market studies among clients and those who commend our fruit to clients. Nine out of ten nation would commend our solution over that of the rivalry.
How did Existek accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
Communication is one of our more hard parts since we are using a one director to take our requirements to the rest of the team. We need to be clear and fix that there is a good apprehension of what we want. Deadlines are always adhered to. We use GitHub, JIRA, Bitbucket, and other tools of this kind.
What did you find most forcible almost Existek?
Existek is a very honorable and probable team. They are nation I would always confide, and I am fully positive that they would do all practicable to fix any possible mistakes in the work.
Are there any areas Existek could better?
I would have liked it if some of Existek',s educeers had better English experiences. The most hard thing has been interaction, but our main touch is fluent and can construe our requirements to the rest of the team. Some of the fruit and project treatment issues have also been due to our side. Existek could gain more apprehension on methodologies for this area, but this is also true for us.
