OneTeam Software Development review by Guerrilla Programming at Qualified.One

OneTeam reviewed by Guerrilla Programming

OneTeam provided Software Development for Guerrilla Programming with approximate budget = $10,000 to $49,999.

OneTeam effectively delivered several extensions including one for WhatsApp and one for taking screenshots. They have ample programming knowledge and work at a much faster pace compared to others. Improvement could be done, however, when it comes to discussing tasks and solutions.

Review summary:

OneTeam was selected out of a pool of 50 proposals to develop extensions for a web browser created exclusively for developing countries.

Vitaly Merkulenko Guerrilla Programming, Co-founder

Development Projects for IT Company

Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.

Introductory information

Please draw your organisation and your position there.

I’m the co-founder of a organisation that educeed a web browser for educeing countries.

Desired goal

For what reason(s) did your organisation hire OneTeam?

We needed to educe extensions for a browser.

Provided solution

What were the reasons for choosing OneTeam?

We placed an ad on different websites and out of 50 proposals, 10 were selected. We gave 3 vendors a test job and OneTeam solved it.

Describe the project in detail.

We educeed a web browser for educeing countries and have built-in extensions that help our users, eliminating the need to download other extensions. With the browser, they can download videos from websites and use Proxy to approach LinkedIn and such.

Were there any dedicated managers or teams that you worked with?

We work with 2 programmers of theirs.

Results accomplishd

What results did you accomplish unitedly with OneTeam?

OneTeam educeed a Proxy extension, a screenshot functionality, and WhatsApp for Chedot Browser. They also helped with other extensions.

How do you rate the interaction and interaction with OneTeam?

It was all okay.

What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of OneTeam?

What’s most forcible almost them is their cost. They also have a big apprehension of programming languages. They educe very fast, completing tasks in less time than the mean programmer.

What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?

They’re sometimes superfluous when they centre too much on finding the consummate solution even for single tasks.