Perfectial Web Development review by Data Marketplace at Qualified.One

Perfectial reviewed by Data Marketplace

Perfectial provided Web Development for Data Marketplace with approximate budget = 50000.

Perfectial consistently delivered the necessary components to build critical features on schedule and in line with the scope. They solved problems as they arose and brainstormed beyond the basic requirements. The team demonstrated a strong commitment and communicated responsively.

Review summary:

Perfectial supported a platform build for a data marketplace. The system includes login, registration, and profile creation functionalities. They also built data aggregation capabilities and feature MVPs.

Data Marketplace, Employee

Front End Development for a Data Marketplace Platform

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I',m part of the fruit team at a data marketplace. We',re edifice a platform that will allow businesses and ultimately individuals to work with, share, sell, and buy data. Our marketplace is open to virtually anyone. Users who publish data have good-grain control over who can see it, who is implicated within the platform itself, and who cannot access it. 

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with Perfectial?

We hired Perfectial to help us set edifice our platform from scratch and educe the prioritized features on our roadmap.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were Perfectial responsible for?

Perfectial focused on frontend educement owing we had powerful backend capabilities in-house. They programmed the code in JavaScript. Our platform contains four main components. For the initial marketplace, the team helped us educe core features like the registration, login, profile creation. They also built out the cleverness to ingest data onto the platform. From there, we educeed MVP versions of different other pieces. 

What is the team compound? 

The number of nation we worked with from Perfectial waxed and waned over time depending on our budget and educement needs. They allocated 10 resources at one stage. Towards the end, we worked with a team of five. A project director served as our main point of touch throughout the process. 

How did you come to work with Perfectial?

One of our co-founder',s touchs recommended Perfectial. They described the team as a specially reliable and answering outsourced educement discretion. Our engagement worked out excellently well, so we continued working unitedly for excellently some time. 

How much have you invested with them?

The cost varied over time depending on the team size. On mean, we spent almost €20,000 (approximately $23,000 USD) per month. 

What is the terminal result of working with Perfectial?

We worked with Perfectial from August 2017–September 2018. 

Results accomplishd

Are there any measureable or plum results?

Week upon week, Perfectial produced the promised deliverables we needed to accomplish as we built true features. We could roll back into the seventh-month view and see all the work we accomplished on a monthly basis. The team’s achievement lay in the forcible number of features we managed to create unitedly achievementfully. They resolved all the issues we skilled and met our deadlines on time. 

How did Perfectial accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

Project treatment was big. They maintained good interaction at all times both towards us and within their inner team. Since we',re based in different countries, corresponding could be hard at times. Overall project treatment was well-coordinated. The team thoroughly understood our priorities and what needed to be done. We were well-matched. 

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with Perfectial?

Perfectial',s order of working was excellently reliable. They were answering, useful, committed to our project, and always ready to go the extra mile. Rather than treating us like just another client, we felt that their team fully contributed to our project. They considered aspects over our exact requirements. 

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

Perhaps they could form a better access to working with setups. They used general pricing and packaging that could be stretched athwart the mean stencil of a organisation. I ponder it would boon them to take on a more case-by-case mentality. 

Do you have any advice for possible clients?

No, not specially. 

Score: 436339

Established in 2000, DevCom is a full-service custom outsourcing software development company. DevCom handles project development throughout the entire lifecycle: starting with strategic planning and UX/UI design, through application development and quali ...

Avg project size: $755000   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 36 works

DevCom Web Development

Score: 393714

Get 2 months of free service, if you show us a single company, that would mention here about its failures and weaknesses. It's near to impossible task to accomplish. Every company, when describing itself, usually overstates its achievements, but missing t ...

Avg project size: $697500   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 14 works

Artelogic Web Development

Score: 214539

We offer comprehensive software discovery, development, and auditing services to help businesses conquer the markets and deliver outstanding technology solutions. With profound technological expertise in a range of business domains such as financial serv ...

Avg project size: $353000   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 34 works

Perfectial Web Development

Score: 149478

Quintagroup is a professional team of experts that provides consulting, Python/DevOps/JS custom software product development to organizations interested in deploying web-based solutions on the base of an open platform. ...

Avg project size: $287778   |   Reviews: 9   |   Portfolio: 5 works

Quintagroup Web Development

Score: 133286


Avg project size: $70714   |   Reviews: 7   |   Portfolio: 6 works

ByteAnt Web Development

Score: 102889

inVerita is a values-based custom software company with a focus on building web(.NET/Node.js/javascript), mobile solutions(Flutter, Native, React-native), QA and providing customers with team extension services. Headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, and being ...

Avg project size: $176000   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 6 works

inVerita Web Development

Score: 96625

Elitex is a Ukrainian software development company with a narrow focus on JavaScript (React, Angular, Node.js). After 4 years of experience, we have strong expertise in web and UI development. Why us? ...

Avg project size: $362500   |   Reviews: 4   |   Portfolio: 8 works

ELITEX Web Development

Score: 93214

Binary Studio is a seasoned software development firm with over 14 years of experience in building world-class software for small and medium-sized businesses.   Our greatest advantage among competitors is an incredibly thorough and competitive selection ...

Avg project size: $147500   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 18 works

Binary Studio Web Development

Score: 32531

Why clients choose us? We specialize in SaaS apps Among top at Authored Python/Django book for Beginners Our Portfolio What we do? ...

Avg project size: $65625   |   Reviews: 8   |   Portfolio: 2 works

SoftFormance Web Development

Score: 27938


Avg project size: $53750   |   Reviews: 4   |   Portfolio: 25 works

Incora Web Development