Perfectial Software Development review by at Qualified.One

Perfectial reviewed by

Perfectial provided Software Development for with approximate budget = 200000.

Resource continuity and thorough problem-solving set Perfectial apart from competitors. The transparency they bring to the table builds mutual trust and enables more effective collaboration.

Review summary:

Perfectial develops features for an existing data services platform meant help users evaluate business stability/performance prior to a corporate acquisition.

, Co-Founder & CTO

Platform Development for Informational Resource Startup

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, special information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

We propose information data services for financial services, special equity, hedge funds, and corporate business outgrowth departments. We prepare sourcing information. Most of our clients are looking to invest in or buy companies that are strategically significant to them. We prepare a platform that allows them to cut through data on companies, mainly special companies that are venture-capital backed. We seted in 2014, and I’m the co-founder and CTO. 

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with Perfectial?

We seted with another outsource resource, but we grew into needing more than one individual. We didn’t want to hire one individual at a time and then try to patch unitedly a team. It made perception to go with an structure that could layer with us. 

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

They basically work on the total platform. I ponder we seted with a team lead and one full-time engineer, and now we’re at seven or eight nation. We added resources as our budget allowed. Perfectial has a lot of nation on staff, so we were able to plug in additional nation as the project grew.

How did you come to work with Perfectial?

I had a preceding real experience with Perfectial. I’ve worked with outsourcing clusters from a lot of places, so I’m reasonably household with the process. I reflection Perfectial had the right weigh of genius, cost, and interaction experiences. We didn’t put it out to bid, I knew what the costs are these days, so I went with the cluster with whom I was snug.

How much have you invested with Perfectial?

We’ve invested almost $700,000 to date.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

I don’t recollect the exact set date. It may have been December of 2014 or the leading region of 2015. This has been one ongoing project since the commencement. 

Results achieved

Could you share any evidence that would prove the productivity, condition of work, or contact of the engagement?

We got to the point where they were generating their own ideas. As they’re edifice the platform, they make suggestions to better it. That’s been awesome. The leading engineer we seted with is quiet with us, and she’s a confideed chief of the team. We have a high level of confide and interaction.

How did Perfectial accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

They set work almost midnight or 1:00 am our time, but I’m up until 3:00–4:00 am, so we have a high level of interaction. It’s been a lot of fun. We use Jira, and that’s been pretty good. I haven’t handled that very heavily until recently, as the team has grown. It was very much unstructured. We would talk almost component sets through emails, and they would handle themselves to get the work done.

More recently, we’ve gotten into using Jira owing the team has grown a lot, and the informal access is a pliant harder. That has gone well too. I get to fling stuff in there, putting in as much detail as I can. I talk with them daily, and then we have a weekly, longer meeting. That’s an occasion for me to tone precedingities. They always have a big log of work they can be doing—pliant bugs and tweaks that they’re more than encouraged to look at when they have downtime. We also use Skype for interaction and Bitbucket for code treatment.

What did you find most forcible almost Perfectial?

They do very well with ambiguity, which I like. I don’t want to tell them how see detail has to look and act. I like to tell them what we have to get onto a page, and they aspect out the best way to do it. More frequently than not, they do a big job at that. I like having that flexibility.

Are there any areas Perfectial could better?

I don’t ponder there’s any area for them to better. I ponder they’re doing a fantastic job. 

Score: 436339

Established in 2000, DevCom is a full-service custom outsourcing software development company. DevCom handles project development throughout the entire lifecycle: starting with strategic planning and UX/UI design, through application development and quali ...

Avg project size: $755000   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 36 works

DevCom Web Development

Score: 393714

Get 2 months of free service, if you show us a single company, that would mention here about its failures and weaknesses. It's near to impossible task to accomplish. Every company, when describing itself, usually overstates its achievements, but missing t ...

Avg project size: $697500   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 14 works

Artelogic Web Development

Score: 214539

We offer comprehensive software discovery, development, and auditing services to help businesses conquer the markets and deliver outstanding technology solutions. With profound technological expertise in a range of business domains such as financial serv ...

Avg project size: $353000   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 34 works

Perfectial Web Development

Score: 149478

Quintagroup is a professional team of experts that provides consulting, Python/DevOps/JS custom software product development to organizations interested in deploying web-based solutions on the base of an open platform. ...

Avg project size: $287778   |   Reviews: 9   |   Portfolio: 5 works

Quintagroup Web Development

Score: 133286


Avg project size: $70714   |   Reviews: 7   |   Portfolio: 6 works

ByteAnt Web Development

Score: 102889

inVerita is a values-based custom software company with a focus on building web(.NET/Node.js/javascript), mobile solutions(Flutter, Native, React-native), QA and providing customers with team extension services. Headquartered in Lviv, Ukraine, and being ...

Avg project size: $176000   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 6 works

inVerita Web Development

Score: 96625

Elitex is a Ukrainian software development company with a narrow focus on JavaScript (React, Angular, Node.js). After 4 years of experience, we have strong expertise in web and UI development. Why us? ...

Avg project size: $362500   |   Reviews: 4   |   Portfolio: 8 works

ELITEX Web Development

Score: 93214

Binary Studio is a seasoned software development firm with over 14 years of experience in building world-class software for small and medium-sized businesses.   Our greatest advantage among competitors is an incredibly thorough and competitive selection ...

Avg project size: $147500   |   Reviews: 10   |   Portfolio: 18 works

Binary Studio Web Development

Score: 32531

Why clients choose us? We specialize in SaaS apps Among top at Authored Python/Django book for Beginners Our Portfolio What we do? ...

Avg project size: $65625   |   Reviews: 8   |   Portfolio: 2 works

SoftFormance Web Development

Score: 27938


Avg project size: $53750   |   Reviews: 4   |   Portfolio: 25 works

Incora Web Development