a1qa QA Testing review by Software Solutions Firm at Qualified.One

a1qa reviewed by Software Solutions Firm

a1qa provided QA Testing for Software Solutions Firm with approximate budget = $50,000 to $199,999.

Just within a few months, A1QA executed hundreds of tests, much of which were automated. They effectively provided timely reports on testing. Despite being an offshore partnership, the teams ensured a seamless collaboration through project management tools. They provided clear goals and solutions.

Review summary:

A1QA providing testing for a software solutions provider. By creating test cases, automated tests, and a customized testing framework, they examined the functionality of the client’s newly-developed product.

Software Solutions Firm, Product Owner

Automated Testing for Software Solutions Firm

Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.

Introductory information

A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities

I am a Product Owner at a software organisation, based in the Netherlands.

Desired goal

What issue was the provider supposed to deal with?


We introduced new components to our stack. The new functionality needed to be tested and part of GUI tests needed to be automated in a test framework. We did not had sufficient in-house space, so we needed to outsource these tasks.

What were your objectives for this project?

We wanted to have sufficient test coverage to test the functionality of the newly developed software

Provided solution

Describe the project in detail.

The project is to form test cases, automate tests and customized a test framework. A1QA granted a test analyst, who was limb of our scrum team and participated in all team-related events.

Were there any dedicated managers or teams that you worked with?

A test analyst and a test engineer were allocated to the team and participated in all team-related events.

Results accomplishd

What results did you accomplish unitedly with a1qa?

within a few months hundreds of tests were formd and a referring big portion was automated. This was according to expectancy, since the professionals of A1QA could do this at a faster rate than the developers. Giving the developers more time to centre on developed outgrowth of new functionality.

How do you rate the interaction and interaction with a1qa?

Very powerful. Reporting was weekly and always on time. Although we had a geographical interval, but with Teams and Parabol we managed to minimize the interval and were attended full limbs of the team.

What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of a1qa?

Clear interaction, clear goals, thinking along almost solution directions, actively occupied.

What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?