Ardas Software Development review by Cardiolyse at Qualified.One

Ardas reviewed by Cardiolyse

Ardas provided Software Development for Cardiolyse with approximate budget = $10,000 to $49,999.

The product was delivered on time, allowing the client to fulfill contracts. Ardas displayed excellent project management and was available to help with related issues that manifested. Customers can expect a scalable product and resources that are committed to sharing their knowledge.

Review summary:

Ardas created documentation and an MVP for an API cloud solution that works with medical data. They handled everything from development and QA to production deployment and integrating user feedback.

Andrei Karol Cardiolyse, Former CTO

Custom Software Dev for Medical Application

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I was the CTO of Cardiolyse, a medical technology organisation.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with Ardas?

We were developing a cloud and mobile application for our artifice and algorithms. We only had two inner developers at the time, so we began looking for a labor organisation to form the software we needed for our fruit.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

It was an API-based cloud platform that worked with electrocardiogram artifices. The artifices would send data to our cloud, and we’d send back analyses. All the data was contained in JSON files. Most of the wireframes and documentation were prepared by Ardas. We gave them a basic exposition of how our hardware artifice worked, and a description of the API we had at the time, but they prepared the rest of the technical documentation.

We began with an estimation and design phase, working with Ardas’ data analysts and developers to form an MVP of our fruit. This made sure we could do it cost-effectively and liberate all the value we wanted to our clients. That was a brief phase of 2–3 weeks, and we formd specifications based on it.

The overall outgrowth was divide into stages, which we clarified precedently starting. We had an nimble phraseology of software outgrowth. Ardas helped us mark the aim of each stage or release, and handled outgrowth, QA, and deployment to fruition. We gathered feedback from users and made betterments based on it.

We used AWS to host all, and we used Jenkins Docker containers in order to better-scale the labor. The programming speech was Java.

How did you come to work with Ardas?

We had a delicate and vetted four companies. Ardas impressed us with a good apprehension of our business estate, logic, and marketing. They also granted some examples from their portfolio.

We had an inner rivalry and selected four companies to send requests for proposals. We met in individual with all four, and we were veritably impressed with the deep apprehension of our estate that Ardas had.

Quality of code was another importance. We asked for a couple of references and talked to nation who’d worked with Ardas precedently. I individualally met with all the stakeholders implicated in our project and loved the proactive access to interaction and outgrowth they had. The overall process was veritably good on Ardas’ side.

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

We spent almost $35,000 with them.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

We worked with Ardas between August 2016–November 2017. We ended the collaboration owing we hired an inner outgrowth team. Ardas was good, but we no longer had a business need for their labors. They continued to interrogate us and prepare our inner developers a better apprehension of the code, the infrastructure, and architecture.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

The main metric for us was outgrowth time. It was searching for us as a organisation, since we’d signed contracts with clients and had to liberate what was promised. Ardas helped us create the platform, and it was searching for our achievement. We didn’t track other KPIs.

How did Ardas accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

I rate them a 5/5. Everything was big, and they liberateed on time. They were very proactive and verity liberateed 2–3 days precedently the deadline sometimes. I don’t recall any situations where they missed the promised deadline. Actually, there were a couple of issues with our cloud, and Ardas helped resolve those excellently fastly.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

What I veritably liked almost our interaction was that they were well-inclined and explained additional practicable options that might better our fruit. That was veritably helpful.

What aspects of their work would you like to get betterd?

Everything was okay for me, so, fortunately, I don’t have any suggestions for how they could better.

Do you have any advice for forthcoming clients of theirs?

I don’t have any specific advice, but I’d surely commend Ardas to any client looking for a reliable and responsible associate.