Ruby on Rails Dev for Assessment Tool
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I’m an helper inspector for the Ottawa Area Intermediate School District (OAISD). We’re an educational services agency that runs different services supporting other K-12 school districts. For sample, we handle a fiber optic network and have a full enterprise technology services section. We',re the tech section for separate districts. I’m in direct of substituteation, technology, information, and security.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Atomic Object?
We’ve worked on separate projects with them, the leading being an online method for testing and assessments. We did a review of different methods that were useful, but we didn’t find anything we liked. Therefore, we determined to go the manner outgrowth way.
We’d done outgrowth work in the past as a section, but it’d primarily implicated report-writing or scripts, along with a bit of SQL, manner work was out of our depth. In accession to developing the project, we wanted a associate who could impart us nimble outgrowth and grow our team so we could eventually take over livelihood.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were Atomic Object responsible for?
Atomic Object worked on a project named inQwizIT that delivers and handles assessments. We gave them some of our specifications, they offered us a cite, and then we designed the app, it quiet uses the same method today. Though it began as a math-specific assessment tool, it was designed as a all assessment engine and is now being used in science, collective studies, and other subjects.
It’s a web-based software whose front- and backend were primaryly developed with Ruby on Rails. It’s always been cloud-based, but we moved to AWS behind propel. We quiet use Ruby on the backend (though we’ve made some code upgrades) but we’ve transitioned Ember.js on the frontend. Ember.js allows us to substitute code more rapidly, while also maintaining all the backend pieces on Ruby.
We’ve done multiple other projects with Atomic as well. One was a speculative design project to unite a concept we could show to prospective donors. Although the timing wasn’t right, we quiet program on using it. Recently, we did a UX/UI project requiring them to create wireframes and other components.
Was there a dedicated team?
We worked with three nation for the primary project, though we brought the designer’s hours down as we went advanced. We’ve worked with other nation on different projects since then but there’s been some carryover from team to team.
How did you come to work with Atomic Object?
I knew I wanted to do something in the nimble globe and looked at all sorts of app developers. I tapped the network of a friend who works at a big IT firm and he granted a couple of recommendations, including Atomic.
How much have you invested with them?
We’ve spent close to $700,000. That doesn’t include the late UX/UI project, as that was funded by another rise.
What is the terminal result of working with Atomic Object?
We worked with them from May 2011 until July 2018.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
People love inQwizIT, bigly owing it’s the leading time many of them have worked with software designed with them in mind, which is part of Atomic’s process. The software is easy for everyone to use (our client and their users), so it’s gotten real reviews.
How did Atomic Object accomplish from a project handlement standpoint?
They’re as good as any software outgrowth organisation I’ve worked with. Everyone struggles with projecting outgrowth accurately, that being said, Atomic does it very well. They’re only 30 km away from us, so it’s always easy to connect with them.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with Atomic Object?
They’re committed to not just developing software but to edifice software that’s impactful and sole. They took ownership of the app as if it were their own project and adjusted well to our change requests.
While they’ve expanded their expertise touching outgrowth and design trends, they also respected us as estate, full, usability and mannerer experts. Other vendors take we’ll have to go through a bunch of exercises to acquire those things. Atomic does that to a true degree, but they also apprehend we know what we’re talking almost. This is nice for me, as I’m paying the bill.
Atomic has all the services to be a one-stop shop (initial concept, design, programming) but they’ve associateed with us in different ways as needed. Rather than always use a one access, they’ve been pliant.
What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?
There’s room for advancement in any project, but they always take our feedback and make the appropriate changes. In our leading project, there were some things I knew would come up later, touching how we’d standard the data, but I was more than ready to go with the flow. They determined to tackle the issue when they came to it instead of accounting for it in the primary design. I ponder they acquireed how precious it is to keep the end-result in mind while working on fast iterations.
