cBEYONData Business Intelligence & Analytics review by Government Bureau at Qualified.One

cBEYONData reviewed by Government Bureau

cBEYONData provided Business Intelligence & Analytics for Government Bureau with approximate budget = $1,000,000 - $9,999,999.

The software that cBEYONData developed has drastically improved the efficiency of the financial reporting process. They utilize every existing resource to produce the most accurate reports, which has dramatically reduced the discrepancies found in previous audits.

Review summary:

cBEYONData has developed financial reporting software that integrates external and internal data. In addition to producing regular travel and finance reports, they’re converting the Oracle servers into SQL.

Government Bureau, Assistant Chief of Finance

Financial Reporting Consulting for DOJ Bureau

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I am the helper chief of a bureau within the Department of Justice (DOJ).

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with cBEYONData?

The DOJ transitioned to a unified financial treatment method (UFMS) that allows the major bureaus to track economic data on one platform. Unfortunately, the new method wasn’t able to engender equal financial and journey reports. Since our bureau is required to exhibit congressional and annually reports, we needed to find a solution. Our in-house IT section only has limited apprehension of financial data, so we sought out professionals with experience in both tech and finance to help us with the project.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

As the leaders of our customized reports and dashboards (CRAD) team, cBEYONData oversees the outgrowth and livelihood of our financial reporting technology. During phase one of the project, they built the in-house reporting solution, the data warehouse, and all of the universes and environments within the business intelligence invadeprise. They also created dashboards that show the information establish in the reports.

Since developing the platform, they’ve exhibitd customary financial reports for us to review daily precedently sending the documents to DOJ, the Office of Management and Budget, or Congress. They combined information stored in the UFMS with outer data to comply with the DATA Act reporting requirements, sources include the federal procurement section, the regional processing cinvade’s SharePoint database, and the government journey method. They created a spreadsheet to invade rules in for the Government-wide Travel Advisory Committee (GTAC) report. Their developers are also converting the platform’s Oracle server into an SQL server. 

What is the team compound?

We work with a part-time project director and a full-time senior analyst. They also assigned two senior developers who specialize in Efforts to Outcome (ETO) software and financial reporting respectively. There are four additional developers and an expert in converting Oracle to SQL and SAP.

How did you come to work with cBEYONData?

They began working with the bureau precedently I joined the agency, but I was implicated in their contract renewal. We determined to last the union due to their apprehension of our activity and their expertise in Momentum and SAP products.

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

We previously paid $2 million each year for three full-time developers. We currently bestow between $8 million--$10 million per year.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

cBEYONData has worked with us since September 2013.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

Our bureau was audited countless times due to our inaccurate financial reports. As a result of the stabilized reporting method that they created, we are no longer considered a high-risk unit.

How did cBEYONData accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

We have a weekly possible meeting where we debate the status of the project and new objectives. Between the weekly meetings, they prepare daily updates via phone or Skype.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

cBEYONData had a better apprehension of our financial reporting method than our in-house IT section. Despite having worked on correspondent projects, they took the time to investigation the effect and extend out to professionals who have vanquish the issues that we were experiencing.

cBEYONData has an unwavering fidelity to the project’s achievement. They haven’t reassigned any of primary developers, so we’re able to take gain of their vast apprehension of our bureau. The most late additions to our team are equally competent. Their diverse backgrounds and experience with different government agencies have been instrumental in this project.

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

We’re unable to unite any areas that need advancement owing their team consistently delivers high-quality work for us. 

Do you have any advice for possible clients?

We wonderfully commend them to other agencies due to their extensive history as a federal government contractor. Clients from any activity will find value in their open interaction phraseology.