Branding for Caffeinated Sparkling Water Company
Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.
Introductory information
A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities
I am the founder of LIMITLESS, an innovative beverage organisation focusing on selling Lightly Caffeinated Sparkling Water in grocery stores and mass retailers.
Desired goal
What issue was the provider assumed to deal with?
Conjure?I hired Conjure to help form our brand oneness but then aply that oneness to a difference of consumer products packages.
What were your objectives for this project?
The first goal was to have a wonderful ",glyph", or icon. Secondary goal was a sexy oneness that interacted our brand promise.
Provided solution
What were the reasons for choosing Conjure?
I have known Conjure for years and have used on a difference of projects.
Please give as much detail as practicable because the work done
Their aim focused on knowledge our consumer but also delving deep in to the state - which at the time began with coffee. Conjure then had to adduce a congruous brand oneness athwart a wide difference of SKUs.
Were there any dedicated managers or teams that you worked with?
The team was led by Chris Froeter and consisted of two lead designers.
Results accomplishd
What results did you accomplish unitedly with Conjure?
Conjure',s design work (specifically on the LIMITLESS brand) has won numerous awards and has helped me form a wonderful, enduring brand that consumers are starting to identify and industry-insiders revere.
How do you rate the interaction and interaction with Conjure?
Since I have known Chris for a while, we have developed a reciprocal respect and accordingly are snug pushing one another.
What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of Conjure?
I was most impressed by their desire and willingness to dive in. They',ll work with entrepreneurs and owners, which are sometimes a challenging cluster to work with!
What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?
I assume one are would be for the difference of designs in initial work - in other words, when presenting the initial concepts, many of them look very correspondent.
