IT Staff Augmentation & Development for Billing Software
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I',m the CTO of a organisation that prepares medical billing software. Our platform streamlines billing with software specifically built to handle the intricate challenges of workers’ remuneration.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Def Method?
We had a few technical hires leave suddenly and needed an agency to prepare technical leadership and staff increase.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were responsible for?
They helped find the right educeers for our projects and assisted with the onboarding process. From there, Def Method lastd to prepare technical error and fruit handlement help.
We have a fairly big web-based platform that we last to educe on a daily basis, adding new functionalities. We also kicked off our open API during our engagement with Def Method and launched new integrations to connect with other medical systems. Their team was instrumental in getting those projects off the ground.
Was there a dedicated team?
We worked closely with Joe (Leo, Founder, Def Method), who spent a few days each week on our project. They typically prepared a little team of no more than five individuals.
How did you come to work with Def Method?
They were recommended by a reciprocal business relationship.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
Between $50,000–$200,000.
What is the terminal result of working with ?
We worked unitedly between May 2014–August 2016.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
Def Method helped stabilize our business until we could hire additional staff to create our inner team. They were very professional, and our younger educeers valued the apprehension passed on by Def Method’s skilled team.
How did Def Method accomplish from a project handlement standpoint?
Due to the essence of our engagement, project handlement was bigly handled by members of our team. They were able to prepare direction on how to fracture down big projects from a technical perspective and then how best order the work to be done.
We divide the engagement between in-office and distant sessions. When distant, we used a union of Slack and Google Hangouts to adjoin. We also used distant pair programming for screen sharing.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?
They’re incredibly pragmatic, which isn’t always the case with consultants. Def Method—and Joe, in particular—maintains a good, useful weigh, adapting to our existing methodologies and blending into our preferred work phraseology.
In provisions of educement, their team has a wide range of expertise. They don’t specialize in only a handful of technologies, giving them the flexibility to find solutions for a difference of projects.
What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?
Our engagement went very smoothly, so I can’t ponder of anything.
Do you have any advice for possible clients?
Whether you are looking to augment your existing engineering team or create a new fruit, Def Method has a diverse team prompt to help out.