DOOR3 Web Development review by Merck at Qualified.One

DOOR3 reviewed by Merck

DOOR3 provided Web Development for Merck with approximate budget = $10,000 to $49,999.

The web app received unanimously positive feedback. Throughout the partnership, DOOR3 was responsive, professional, and flexible. They were open to feedback and accommodated requests. The team communicated well over a variety of platforms.

Review summary:

DOOR3 built an online database repository for a third party. The team created wireframes and developed referencing functionalities for the web application.

Vinay Mehta Merck, Epidemiologist

Web App Dev for Pharmaceutical Company

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I’m an epidemiologist at Merck.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with DOOR3?

We wanted to create an online database repository. Our vendor subcontracted DOOR3 to help educe the web application.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were DOOR3 responsible for?

The solution needed to summarize attributes almost existing databases. Our vendor limited DOOR3’s involvement to web app educement. The team created wireframes and we reviewed their work precedently moving advanced. DOOR3 then built a set of functionalities that enabled us to unite possible databases for a specific oncology study.

Was there a dedicated team?

We interacted with two nation including the proprietor and a main point of touch. They had a team working behind the scenes.

How did you come to work with DOOR3?

Our vendor hired DOOR3 owing they had worked unitedly precedently.

How much have you invested with them?

We spent between $15,000–$20,000.

What is the terminal result of working with DOOR3?

We worked unitedly from April–November 2018.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

We had nothing but real feedback. Every user and stakeholder was satisfied with the app.

How did DOOR3 accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

Due to the third-party relationship, we were not implicated with DOOR3 from a project treatment standpoint. The team was pliant and ready to make any adaptations that would help us meet our needs. We didn’t have any complaints almost the union. The teams interacted via phone, email, and teleconference meetings.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with DOOR3?

DOOR3 granted professional, answering, and courteous labor. We were satisfied with the high-quality solution and would work with them anew.

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

No, I can’t ponder of anything.

Do you have any advice for possible clients?

Communicate with them soon and review wireframes carefully.