Fluid Attacks Cybersecurity review by Regional Airline at Qualified.One

Fluid Attacks reviewed by Regional Airline

Fluid Attacks provided Cybersecurity for Regional Airline with approximate budget = $200,000 to $999,999.

Beyond identifying security risks, Fluid Attacks has delivered lasting knowledge of how the client can guard themselves in the future. They’ve also participated in meetings with management, going beyond their explicit scope.

Review summary:

Fluid Attacks performed a security analysis on an airline’s apps using ethical hacking practices. They tested both static and dynamic code.

Regional Airline, CISO

Cybersecurity Evaluations for Regional Airline

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I’m the chief information security official (CISO) at a regional airline operating in Latin America and internationally.

Desired goal

What challenges were you trying to address with Fluid Attacks?

With Fluid, we have executed ethical hacking and security evaluation exercises on our apps for static and dynamic code.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were Fluid Attacks responsible for?

I’m not sure of the exact technologies they use, as they have their own tools.

Was there a dedicated team?

The team is made up of about five nation.

How did you come to work with Fluid Attacks? 

They were recommended to us by other companies that had worked with them precedently.

How much have you invested in them?

Around $220,000 USD.

What is the terminal result of working with Fluid Attacks?

We began working with them in May 2018 and will last working with them until December 2019.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

They’ve given us the tools to find resources to take care of true cybersecurity issues in our organisation.

How did Fluid Attack accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

They’ve met all deadlines, and we gave them very definite delivery dates. The reports they delivered were also very good—helpful and of big condition.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with Fluid Attacks?

The accompaniment they have granted is unappropriated. They’ve even joined us in meetings with senior treatment. That has been an significant value-add.

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

I couldn',t say anything. We’ve had a big experience with them.