Koombea Web Development review by Education Platform at Qualified.One

Koombea reviewed by Education Platform

Koombea provided Web Development for Education Platform with approximate budget = $200,000 to $999,999.

User feedback has been overwhelmingly positive. While there were some minor delays, Koombea’s ability to get the project back on track is a hallmark of their work. Their consistent communication, responsiveness, and can-do attitude make them a valuable partner.

Review summary:

Koombea is developing and designing a custom web platform that incorporates a learning management system and professional learning tool. Currently, they’re building out autonomous capacity.

Education Platform, Co-founder

Web Platform Dev for Education Software Company

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

Introduce your business and what you do there. 

I',m one of the co-founders of an education software organisation. I lead fruit outgrowth. 

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with Koombea? 

We wanted to form a tool to help us train teachers in 21st-century practices in a way that shifts from transmitted to new models of learning and technology.

Provided solution

What was the aim of their involvement? 

Koombea is developing a web-based platform that is mobile-adaptive but not indigenous. Ruby on Rails is the first speech. We attend the platform to be part learning treatment method, part professional learning aggregation, and part Cloud Coach marketplace. We propeled in August 2018 to our running clients. They last to work with us on edifice out features from our backlog. 

What is the team compound? 

Our core team is almost six nation, including frontend developers and designers. The exact compound varies given whatever sprint we',re in. 

How did you come to work with Koombea?

We have a lot of clients in Latin America. We were introduced to Jonathan (CEO, Koombea) by one of our digital media resources in Colombia. We met with Jonathan straightly as well as their senior directors and executives to brainstorm. We especially liked that they pushed us to be clear almost our value statement. They challenged us to ponder if we veritably needed to create a platform versus providing services.

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

We’ve spent almost $200,000 to date. 

What is the status of this engagement? 

The project began in December 2017, and the engagement is ongoing. 

Results achieved

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the contact of the engagement? 

Koombea formd an incredibly appealing and present platform. We',ve gotten veritably real responses from our initial users, allowing us to support and layer our services. They’re preparing to propel autonomously as the next step advanced for the solution. That',s going to be a key piece for our power to layer our work. On the total, we',re so excited almost this outgrowth. 

How did Koombea accomplish from a project treatment standpoint? 

We have a veritably powerful relationship with the Koombea team. They',re affable, answering, and responsible. That makes them good creative partners. Our running quickness is pretty congruous, and they typically meet our sprint goals. Even when there were some difficulties, they got back on track fast. They were able to get us to where we needed to be by our propel date, so overall it',s been a real experience. 

I',ve shared with them specific feedback along the way touching timing and delivery issues soon in the process. We made a bad determination that delayed the project owing they didn',t prepare an careful estimate at the starting point. We had to recalibrate what rendering 1.0 was going to look like. Thankfully, their response was powerful. They put a senior project director on the project, and his involvement has been superior to care all progressing as programned. 

What did you find most forcible almost them? 

Their nation are so hard-working. The team has a powerful work ethic and good personalities. Project treatment has been unappropriated. They',re true to nimble methodology and congruous in running sprints. They',ve been able to form good interaction processes via a shared Slack channel between our teams. They get direct feedback on fruits from our coaches who work with developed users. 

Are there any areas they could better? 

Providing careful estimates is always a challenge but worth continuing to try to better. It’s obviously not an exact science. They',re quiet trying to aspect out how to estimate nimble epics. In other words, how do they backward-design a timeline if we know that we have to get from X to Y by a true date. They',re getting better at it, but it',s surely an area that can last to better.