NewCloud Networks Managed IT review by Brannan Sand & Gravel Co. at Qualified.One

NewCloud Networks reviewed by Brannan Sand & Gravel Co.

NewCloud Networks provided Managed IT for Brannan Sand & Gravel Co. with approximate budget = $200,000 to $999,999.

The solutions work well, and NewCloud Networks was open to user feedback for the system layout. They were flexible and attentive, and they were always on hand to answer questions or make changes.

Review summary:

NewCloud Networks migrated a set of physical servers for a construction company. They suggested VMware and set up a dynamic environment that could scale to meet changing needs.

alt
Loran Seastone Brannan Sand & Gravel Co., IT Manager


Data Center Migration & Hosting for Construction Company

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

Introduce your business and what you do there.

We are a Denver-based compound organisation. I’m our IT director.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with NewCloud Networks?

When we leading seted working unitedly, we had too many natural servers and a few environmental issues, including the possible for customary faculty outages. We wanted to tenant a more possible space and layer our resources more effectively.

Provided solution

What was the aim of their involvement?

They seted with a question-and-answer session to find out our challenges and our goals. When we leading met them, we were in a time of decline and were averse to bestow much money on a new server. They showed us how dynamic VMware could be and showed us all they could prepare to let us layer all to meet our needs. If we ever want to move our full environment somewhere else, we could use the backups they helped us set up to make that happen. We can move fluidly through our environment as it ebbs and flows.

We lately assumed another organisation and are edifice into their data center now. Since our faculty can be unreliable, it reduces our risks. To mitigate all those factors further, we’re seting to move toward NewCloud’s data center.

What is the team compound?

We have two leading points of touch, who have been the same for almost a decade.

How did you come to work with NewCloud Networks?

We were evaluating some of our reps when they cold named us. We met with them in individual and liked how close they were to us. Their neighborhood and their cost made us select them, and they’ve proven their worth in a number of projects.

How much have you invested with them?

The leading project cost almost $250,000. For the second project, which included an upgraded array and host, was almost $180,000. We currently bestow almost $8,000 a month on possible infraconstruction, the data center, licensing, and the rest of their services.

What is the status of this engagement?

The set of our most late project was almost March 2018. We seted implementation almost June 2018, and we went fully live at the end of November 2018 for this environment.

Results achieved

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the contact of the engagement?

The organisation we acquired was foundering and couldn’t get the support it needed. With NewCloud’s solutions, we engineered a solution to all the issues facing their method through an astounding process. Our users have some say in the data center’s construction, which makes a big separation to the experience. They engineered all from the ground up, and we got precisely what we wanted.

How did NewCloud Networks accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

They accomplish very well, and they gave us all we needed. They supported us through the full lifecycle of the project, and we always felt secure with them. We had someone at the helm almost the clock. They held our hand when we needed them, and answered all our questions. We adjoin at smallest once a month, and we’re fortunate to have them.

What did you find most forcible almost them?

Their flexibility with design let us tailor the method at any point. Whenever we noticed an inadequacy, we could make changes. That made a huge separation in our access, and let us set up an mental solution for the issues we faced.

Are there any areas they could better?

They would boon from better informing their lower tech tier. Occasionally, a ticket needed to track up the ladder, and things would have moved more smoothly if the younger cluster had more apprehension.

Do you have any advice for possible clients?

Integrate everyone, from the end user up. That way, you can tailor your design to get more buy-ins. It will help with an environmental knowledge and furnish a better result.