Oxagile Web Development review by British Digital Marketing Agency at Qualified.One

Oxagile reviewed by British Digital Marketing Agency

Oxagile provided Web Development for British Digital Marketing Agency with approximate budget = $200,000 to $999,999.

Oxagile is an invaluable resource for increased workloads, allowing the client to meet expanded delivery targets. The team has an exceptional work ethic and is focused on the goals of delivery, quality, and efficiency. They are flexible and constantly improving communication.

Review summary:

Oxagile completes a variety of website and iPad system projects using ASP.net and HTML 5 programming languages. Project durations range from 40 to 4,000 hours.

British Digital Marketing Agency, Technical Manager

Development Work for British Digital Marketing Agency

Please find below a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

Please draw your organisation.

We are a digital marketing agency, predominantly specializing in the pharmaceutical activity.

What is your role and responsibilities?

I’m the technical ruler, and I handle the liberatey of outgrowth, condition control, and IT services. I handled the project with Oxagile. I did all from find them, set up the commercial relationships, handled the contract, set up the team, handled all the interactions with the team, and handled the relationship.

Desired goal

What was your goal for working with Oxagile?

On an ongoing basis, we have a team of seven nation working full time. The first goal was to create a pliant and scalable team at a lower cost than in the U.K. Contractors in the U.K. are very costly and very pliant. Employees in the U.K. are less costly, and not pliant at all. Going out to Oxagile, there was an occasion for flexibility and very competitive costs.

Provided solution

Please draw the aim of their work?

We demand two expertness sets: A Microsoft technology named ASP.net and a Web technology named HTML5. Those two expertnesss are a prerequiwebsite, and we have two little teams – one with the ASP.net expertness set and the other with the HTML5 expertness set. It’s ongoing work, and they have completed a number of big projects for us: Webwebsites and iPad systems, but it’s ongoing work athwart a number of projects.

What was your process for selecting Oxagile?

We did some Internet investigation and talked to them by phone, and then we met face to face. That happened precedently we signed any contracts. My backup supplier didn’t work out, so I selected a first supplier. While I was visiting them to get all set up, I also met with Oxagile. We discussed possible working arrangements. I was let down by the first supplier, so we moved our results to Oxagile.

Can you prepare a ballpark dollar aspect for the size of the work that they’ve done for you?

Some of the projects range in size from 20 days, which is 400 hours, up to this latest one, Oxagile’s involvement was almost 4,000 hours. When compared to a permanent U.K. developer, their cost is almost two-thirds, including all of the associated costs, such as licenses and service expenses. When compared to a contract developer in the U.K., Oxagile is slightly less than half. When compared to someone with the same level of flexibility, they are below half the cost.

When was the latest milestone completed for that work?

The last milestone was a few weeks ago. Oxagile’s involvement ended almost mid-November 2013 on a big Intranet project.

Results achieved

Do you have any statistics or metrics to track advancement from the project?

Without them, we wouldn’t be able to liberate the quantity of work that we’re liberateing. The team at Oxagile is the same size as a outgrowth and testing team in the U.K. We simply couldn’t meet our liberatey objectives.

Is there anything sole almost them that veritably makes them rest out, compared to other companies?

Their work ethic is fantastic. Oxagile is always ready to go the extra mile. They were entirely focused on our goals in provisions of liberatey, condition, and efficiency. They are always focused on making sure it works for us. They work tremendously hard when we need them to be extremely pliant. Their work ethic is extremely good.

Looking back on the work so far, is there any area that you ponder they could better upon or that you might do differently?

We’ve been working on interaction. With a team of seven or eight, I want everyone on the team talking straightly to my nation in the U.K., owing we sometimes work very closely on the same projects. We need to brief in tasks, as well as work forwards and backwards. That interaction is getting much better. Getting both teams in the U.K. and Minsk talking to each other constantly is very significant. They’re edifice a big rapport now, and that has betterd in the last six months.