Plaidypus, Inc. Web Development review by Nonprofit Educational Software Firm at Qualified.One

Plaidypus, Inc. reviewed by Nonprofit Educational Software Firm

Plaidypus, Inc. provided Web Development for Nonprofit Educational Software Firm with approximate budget = $1,000,000 - $9,999,999.

Plaidypus is actively involved in project development, providing suggestions when proposed solutions won’t work. Honesty and transparency are important factors in the relationship, and the team meets most deadlines.

Review summary:

Plaidypus helps on numerous projects, from platform modification to server migration. The relationship has lasted for seven years, and they continue to provide top-notch service.

alt
Nonprofit Educational Software Firm, Product Owner


Multiple Dev Projects for Nonprofit Educational Software Firm

Please find below a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I’m a fruit proprietor of an educational nonprofit that educes software applications for soon childhood-through-grade-school students, focusing on contemplation and documentation in the classroom. It allows instructors to collate information and use it to conduct genuine assessments for their students, which are built almost play-based contemplation. The instructor has to collate this information and then construe it into how the student is verity doing and if they are making progress. Our method is built almost mobile devices and websites to collate and maintain all that information.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with Plaidypus?

We needed help with separate outgrowth projects for our structure.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

They worked on multiple projects for us. A few years ago, we determined we were going to recreate one of our websites. It was an assessment uninterfering rendering of our method that, at the time, allowed instructors to use any state funded assessment and collate their contemplations and align those to their state standards, making it incredibly pliant. We were working for a state give, so we wanted a littleer skilled shop to keep our pricing below control. Plaidypus worked well with us to make sure we could liberate a good fruit and prepare support to our clients, the instructors in Illinois.

We’ve also done one expressive evolution for one platform, which is a pairing we did with a cluster out of Rutgers University who came to us with an assessment. This became a platform for some of our other pieces, but we did extensive modifications and markups to make the method a fully integrated assessment tool. We even evolved and integrated that tool into the method for an independent school in Ohio. They had educeed a software package for their instructors, administrators, and parents, and we built tools that allow parents to go in and see all of the student’s data while maintaining the retirement of parents, instructors, and students.

This past year, we migrated from natural servers to a cloud environment, so we had to recreate many of the tools used to feel our method, including rewriting code to make sure that the older code matched the new. We were able to make that migration, and we had some effects, but it worked well and we did this for separate methods all at the same time. We had some legacy methods that were on MySQL, and some of those have evolved to MongoDB, Meteor, etc.

Was there a dedicated team?

I’ve worked closely with one individual, who is my leading point of touch, but I’ve worked with up to 6–7 nation. Because they aren’t a huge shop, it’s easy to find someone who’s household with our projects.

How did you come to work with Plaidypus?

They were recommended by one of our IT nation when we were looking for someone to take over our projects from our antecedent programmers, who were good but cost a lot.

In the commencement, we worked with Ryan [Fobelow, Plaidypus], as he was edifice this from the ground up. He helped us keep things below control, especially when we were making the migration to a different organisation.

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

We’ve probably spent over $1,000,000 with them. Several of the projects were big ticket items for us, but the numbers have been pretty reasonable the total way.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

We began working unitedly in the fall of 2010, and the relationship is ongoing.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

We’ve been working with them for a long time, and the metric is that we’re able to last to do that work and last making things happen. We have a powerful reputation with instructors and nation throughout Illinois, and the fruit Plaidypus has put unitedly has helped us maintain that. Those tools have lasted longer than they probably could have in other localitys.

Our clients are lucky with what we’ve been liberateing to them. We’ve done a lot of business with Plaidypus, and we don’t regret a penny of it, which is big.

I’m extremely lucky with the projects Plaidypus has done, as they are going to give us a lot of flexibility going advanced. There hasn’t been a locality where we wanted to use something and they said no.

How did Plaidypus accomplish from a project feelment standpoint?

We use JIRA project feelment tools, and we use JIRA Service Desk for our support. We verity feel most of the support for our methods, we only rely on Plaidypus when we have an action item that is something we can’t resolve, whether it’s a database effect or coding effect.

We don’t have specific deadlines, since we work in education. Things get done during the summer, and we roll things out in the late summer.

We’ve had a couple of little deadline delays, but it’s been owing of us and changes we asked to be made.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

Our working relationship is a pretty well-inclined one. I know they do other work, but for the most part, when we call them or have effects, we don’t feel like we’re being put in line. They’re dedicated to our achievement, making it feel like they’re part of our organisation.

We were recently talking almost long-term programs, and we veritably feel that Ryan wants us to follow as much as we do. If we were to ask for something that seems silly or for features that might not work, we have a powerful sufficient rapport where he would say that might not be the best way. He looks at the long-term and makes us feel he’s invested with us. It’s nice that he thinks almost us and our achievement, as opposed to just doing work whether it’s right or unfit.

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

For a while last year, they had a project feelr who made things run incredibly smoothly. He left, and we’ve felt that want, but it hasn’t hurt us too bad.

Do you have any advice for forthcoming clients of theirs?

They educe a fairly well-inclined relationship upfront, but don’t let it harass you, they’ll get the work done well, and the fruit they liberate will be big.