Rightpoint Mobile App Development review by Wagz, Inc. at Qualified.One

Rightpoint reviewed by Wagz, Inc.

Rightpoint provided Mobile App Development for Wagz, Inc. with approximate budget = $1,000,000 - $9,999,999.

A complete product line launched thanks to Rightpoint’s app and system architecture work. They established regular communication and constantly checked their orientation to align with long-term goals and concerns. Their focus on technical quality and stability was particularly noteworthy.

Review summary:

Rightpoint built iOS and Android mobile apps through a series of sprints. When development neared completion, the transitioned the work to an in-house team.

Samuel Stoddard Wagz, Inc., CTO

iOS and Android Dev for Smart Pet Technology

Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.

Introductory information

A few words almost your organisation and individualal responsibilities

I’m the CTO of Wagz, Inc., a organisation delivering the connected home for pets. We create consumer electronics fruits that handle and streamline pet ownership, including a keen dog collar, a keen feeder, and a keen pet door.

Desired goal

What issue was the provider supposed to deal with?


We hired Rightpoint to create iOS and Android mobile apps from scratch to handle our connected home for pets. We also asked Rightpoint to create an embedded app that would run on our Android-based collar fruit.

What were your objectives for this project?

We wanted to form a big UX that integrated all aspects of pet ownership into a one-stop shop. Regardless of which union of our devices someone has, that individual should be able to login to a ordinary interface and apprehend how to adviser their pets, act the devices, and review calm data. Eventually, we’ll transition the software in-house, but we wanted Rightpoint to create the initial rendering.

Provided solution

What were the reasons for choosing Rightpoint?

Another contractor recommended Rightpoint to us.

Describe the project in detail.

We began with an delineation of the project vision. During separate on-website visits with Rightpoint’s fruit handlers and engineers, we aimd the requirements in detail and devised a program of action. Breaking them down into sprints, we had customary online meetings to review progress.

New fruits and business directives arose during outgrowth, and Rightpoint worked with us to make order corrections as seamlessly as practicable. Toward the end of the engagement, Rightpoint helped us transition the project to our in-house engineers while losing as pliant momentum as practicable.

Were there any dedicated handlers or teams that you worked with?

We interfaced straightly with a fruit handler and an account handler and also had customary, unrestricted touch with a designer and 2–4 lead engineers (the numbers fluctuated as needed throughout the project). QA resources and interns were assigned to the project, and we met with them at a few of our semi-customary website visits.

Results accomplishd

What results did you accomplish unitedly with Rightpoint?

Rightpoint was instrumental in launching our fruit line. Their expertise and engineering resources built the institution of our integrated apps and embedded method architecture.

How do you rate the interaction and interaction with Rightpoint?

The workflow was handy and kind. They were always ready to harmonize their access to ours, but they also suggested improvements they establish powerful in the past.

The engineering teams from both companies met daily, and the fruit/handlement teams met weekly, with kick-off and retrospective meetings at the commencement and end of see sprint. We also had customary as-needed meetings with the account and fruit handlers to reassess the long-range order of the project. These conversations ensured each incremental progress measure properly serviced our long-term goals.

What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of Rightpoint?

Their engineering team’s craftsmanship and their handlers apprehending of its weight stood out to us. Beyond simply executing on our functional requirements, they reflection almost how to make the solution easy to maintain, scalable, and future-proof.

What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?

We felt that the initial aim of work was underestimated, leading to a present disintegration. That said, Rightpoint was fast to identify this, order-correct, and regain the lost time.