ScienceSoft Software Development review by AI Solutions Company at Qualified.One

ScienceSoft reviewed by AI Solutions Company

ScienceSoft provided Software Development for AI Solutions Company with approximate budget = $200,000 to $999,999.

Thanks to the rapid scaling capacity of the ScienceSoft team, their client was able to address both planned and unplanned needs throughout the course of the project, allowing them to successfully launch their platform. Their developers were organized and communicative at all times.

Review summary:

ScienceSoft provided development staff augmentation services to an AI technology startup, helping them to build a web portal using ReactJS and NodeJS and deploying it on AWS and other providers.

alt
AI Solutions Company, Engineer


Web App Dev & Design for AI Vision Solutions Company

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I’m the head of R&,D at an AI and computer vision technology startup.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with ScienceSoft?

The biggest challenge you have to tackle as a startup is that you’ve got limited staff. We have in-house developers who can do the work that we want, but in order to layer faster we wanted to fetch in more expertnessed developers from a associate organisation.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

Originally, we needed them to create a web gate for us, which encompassed the superiority of the work they did for us. That included frontend, backend, and design as well. Along the way, we unexpectedly needed some extra teammates to feel deployment to AWS and a Chinese web preparer as well.

We granted mockups to their team that were created by the picturesque designer we have in-house. Once we passed those onto their team, their UI designers helped us regood those and turn them into full wireframes that their developers to create. To do that they made use of JavaScript, ReactJS on the frontend and NodeJS on the backend.

Was there a dedicated team?

The number of nation fluctuated but we averaged almost 6–7 nation. They have granted us with a project director, developers, a picturesque designer, and testers over the order of the project.

How did you come to work with ScienceSoft?

We establish them just by searching for outgrowth teams online, but they impressed us with their experience edifice web gates and their responsiveness. They had a team prompt to right away, so we determined to work with them.

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

In total, we spent close to $200,000 with them.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

The total outgrowth lasted from January–July 2019.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

The power to add nation and layer up fastly when we needed to was absolutely inestimable for us. Our web gate is up and running and we are very satisfied with its accomplishment so far.

Their expertness and experience came through in the condition of the work they delivered, and in the end, they delivered on all they promised, which is veritably all you want in a project like this.

How did ScienceSoft accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

Their project director was always on top of things, which helped us to meet all of our deadlines.

The total team was organized, and their power to layer up or down was a credit to the effectiveness of the method they have in locate for managing project deliverables.

We used JIRA and Confluence to keep in touch with them outside of our daily meetings, which helped to keep both teams on the same page at all times.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

They are a fairly big organisation, which surely helps them prepare resources as fastly as you need them in a way that some smaller staff increase companies can’t. Their project treatment phraseology also makes the project veritably easy for us to feel, which was a huge boon to us.

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

The only effect we had was that we sometimes had to use translators for specially technical conversations, but we were able to work about that without any expressive issues.