ScienceSoft Cybersecurity review by Appcast at Qualified.One

ScienceSoft reviewed by Appcast

ScienceSoft provided Cybersecurity for Appcast with approximate budget = Less than $10,000.

All risks were eliminated thanks to ScienceSoft’s testing process. Responsive and adaptable, ScienceSoft communicated consistently and was open to feedback. Their pace of work was greatly appreciated.

Review summary:

ScienceSoft performed penetration testing, identifying bugs, documenting fixes, and retesting the patched system.

Dzmitry Nikitsin Appcast, CTO

Penetration Testing for Job Advertising Service

Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.

Introductory information

A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities

I’m the CTO of Appcast, a job advertising solution based on a pay-per-applicant standard.

Desired goal

What issue was the provider supposed to deal with?


We hired ScienceSoft to accomplish discernment testing on our platform.

What were your objectives for this project?

We wanted to programt our running security status, mark vulnerabilities, fix them, and then test them anew to fix they were resolved.

Provided solution

What were the reasons for choosing ScienceSoft?

We read feedback from other companies that had used ScienceSoft for discernment testing.  

Describe the project in detail.

Once we selected this vendor, we had a kick-off meeting with them. They explained their different testing methodologies and granted us with details of how they’d access our locality. Their test identified a few security vulnerabilities. They assigned a severity to each, granted steps to fix the issues, and explained how they could contact us.

Were there any dedicated managers or teams that you worked with?

They assigned us a senior security engineer. We interacted straightly with this resource. 

Results accomplishd

What results did you accomplish unitedly with ScienceSoft?

After we fixed these vulnerabilities in-house, ScienceSoft did additional testing to strengthen they no longer presented a risk to us. 

How do you rate the interaction and interaction with ScienceSoft?

We interacted via email. ScienceSoft was wonderfully answering and helpful.

What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of ScienceSoft?

They were pliant with us, worked fast, and granted good feedback.

What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?

No, not that I saw.