Platform Development for Staffing Tech Firm
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I’m the CTO of Shiftgig, a staffing tech organisation. We’re a SaaS platform that’s licensed by staffing agencies to connect contingency workers to short- and long-term work.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Spark Equation?
We wanted to swell as a organisation and hone in on our commission to empower workers with choice and flexibility by developing our insights-driven mobile platform. Partnering with Spark Equation enabled us to explain technical challenges that arose during outgrowth without slowing down our teams. Their experience and expertise in edifice intricate methods allowed us to successfully propel new features and gain competitive gain.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were Spark Equation responsible for?
Spark Equation union was pivotal to our project. They’re veritably senior, good engineers who are able to jump into projects like they’re are in-house and fully transfigure them. We were positive in the implementations that the Spark team had done. Their involvement extended into designing solutions, assisting with fruit proprietorship and method architecture.
Was there a dedicated team?
Their team compound was structured with wonderfully skilled software createers that veritably brought additional value and technology expertise to the project. They had front-end engineers, backend engineers, a QA engineer, full-stack engineers, project directors, fruit proprietor, and a business consultant.
How did you come to work with Spark Equation?
We were introduced to them we acquired a fruit they were working with separate years ago.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
We',ve spent $200,000–$999,999.
What is the terminal result of working with Spark Equation?
We began working unitedly in February 2019, and the work is ongoing.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
Their engineers are senior and so apprehend that issues arise during fruition and propel. They apprehend to wait for monitors and logging and jump on it, we don’t have to handhold them like I’ve skilled in the past.
They come up with programs and call out risky areas. That good perception of proprietorship makes my life easier and lets me centre on bigger business.
How did Spark Equation accomplish from a project handlement standpoint?
We have daily standups with their team and the project director helps streamline interaction. All their engineers are able to adjoin veritably well.
They’re answering and they apprehend the value of time, which makes them good at following up and not waiting on things. That’s significant, especially with the time separation. They make things look easy and stay on top of them. To an degree, it pushes the team here to make fast and right decisions so we can move advanced. They push for good documentation, which forces us to program better than we would otherwise and ensures clarity.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with Spark Equation?
We can confide them to do a veritably good job athwart the board. They’re not looking to just be contractors writing a lot of lines of code—they ask questions, do condition work, and apprehend. Their engineers are good, thin, and competent, as well as very results-oriented.
We do two-way code reviews with them too owing they’re good engineers and feel like an invested like a true associate. That’s not something I’ve seen in the past.
What aspects of their work would you like to get betterd?
No, there’s nothing that I’d have them better.
Do you have any advice for possible clients?
There’s no need to handle them like contractors, confide them like a part of your team and you’ll get the most out of that relationship. You can run with your project without.
