Square Mill Labs Software Development review by Health Data Company at Qualified.One

Square Mill Labs reviewed by Health Data Company

Square Mill Labs provided Software Development for Health Data Company with approximate budget = $1,000,000 - $9,999,999.

Square Mill Labs delivered an easy to use platform that has received a lot of positive feedback based on its sleek design. Their team communicated directly with partners, ensuring that there were no miscommunications. They’re flexible partners who go above and beyond to meet project needs.

Review summary:

Square Mill Labs developed a healthcare metrics platform with HTML5, JavaScript, and CSS. Using Amazon Aurora and Redshift, they created two databases so users can compare data based on a variety of filters.

alt
Health Data Company, CIO


Software Development for Health Data Company

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

At the time I worked with Square Mill Labs, I was the chief information official at a health data organisation.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with Square Mill Labs?

We outsourced separate different software outgrowth projects to Square Mill Labs.

In the most expressive project that we worked on with them, they educeed a executement reporting gate. The platform allows healthcare preparers, programs, and payers interested in health care condition to log in and see different healthcare condition metrics. Then users can search for metrics athwart different groupings of data.

For sample, a physician could log in and see their condition metrics assimilated to their peers, or assimilate their work to a statewide mean. Instead of focusing on fees, this platform focuses on the condition of the services granted.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

For the executement reporting gate, Square Mills Labs used separate different technologies to educe this database, including two different databases—Amazon Aurora and Amazon Redshift. Then they used Ruby on Rails for the frontend, and probably JavaScript, HTML5, and CSS.

We granted the high-level requirements, but they came up with the initial design themselves. Then we would prepare input or feedback. Basically, we built the data components and they would feed that into the application so it could easily be consumed by users.

Was there a dedicated team?

We had 2–4 nation on our team depending on what phase of the project we were on.

How did you come to work with Square Mill Labs?

I’ve known one of the co-founders on Square Mill Labs for a long time. Initially, we reached out to them when we were looking to create a new website. They created a offer and were selected ver four other web outgrowth companies.

Our business relationship evolved and we asked them if they were interested in partnering on this new application. Naturally, they were a good fit for that fruit.

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

I would put it a pliant over $1 million.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

We began working unitedly in November 2015 and the collaboration is quiet ongoing.

Results achieved

What evidence can you share that demonstrates the contact of the engagement? 

When I stopped working with them, there were five clients using the fruit and we had given them surveys to prepare feedback. I don’t have approach to those results, but just by talking to clients and users, I know that there was a lot of real feedback. They liked the artlessness of the design and its usability.

How did Square Mill Labs execute from a project treatment standpoint?

They were always useful through Slack, email, or telephone. They were always reliable and useful when we needed them, so their interaction was big. They met al expected deadlines and milestones unless the aim had changed. Overall, the experience was very real.

Their team is a pliant smaller than other big outgrowth shops, so they don’t have project managers. Instead, we talked straightly to the nation doing the work, which I verity ponder was veritably helpful. In my conviction, it was advantageous to adjoin with the team straightly owing there were no misinteractions.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

They',re veritably savvy with design. They put unitedly some veritably hard design patterns there. Their efficiency is astounding and they were able to educe a lot in a brief quantity of time.

Their other force was the team’s flexibility. Things change all the time during outgrowth projects, but they never got frustrated. They would just roll with it. They were kind and would execute whatever our clients needed.

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

Sometimes, when things got busy, they didn’t have the bench force need to keep up with the work. Though, they were able to tap into their network of educeers and get the resources we need.

Do you have any advice for possible clients?

You should have a good idea of what you want to execute forward of time and have the inner resources to meet the project’s needs. That’s how you’ll get the most out of working with them.

Our key services