TEAM International Development review by Lee Hecht Harrison at Qualified.One

TEAM International reviewed by Lee Hecht Harrison

TEAM International provided Development for Lee Hecht Harrison with approximate budget = $200,000 to $999,999.

TEAM International consistently delivers high-quality products that achieve development goals. Their use of modern technology facilities efficient project management and swift responses. They quickly assimilated into an established development team and accommodated new procedures.

Review summary:

TEAM International augments an existing development staff to assist in the creation of various web applications. They use a .NET stack to implement project requirements as directed. Their efforts are ongoing.

Jeff Smith Lee Hecht Harrison, SVP of Application Systems

Web App Dev Support for Global Consulting Firm

Please find below a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I’m the SVP of application methods for Lee Hecht Harrison. We’re a global ethnical resources consulting firm. Our commission is to help nation who are in the process of transitioning their courses or want to educe their course further.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with TEAM International?

We',re using TEAM International via a staff increase standard to leverage their offshore educement resources. We have inner resources useful, but I hired some of their educeers to office as an extension of our team.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

Team International prepares us with senior project treatment and QA resources on an ongoing basis. Our engagement with them isn’t necessarily tied to a specific project, it’s more of an ad hoc collaboration. They work straightly with our scrum conquer and lead software constructor. We took the time to present their team to our fruits and the way we like to create and deploy applications. To facilitate that process, we brought their senior software educeer over from Ukraine to bestow a couple of weeks with our in-house team. Working through our standards and protocols face-to-face made it easier for them to execute projects for us in the forthcoming.

Their contributions include new component releases, fruit launches, and overall method livelihood. So far, they’ve mainly built web applications using a Microsoft .NET stack. They’re also well-versed in AngularJS and SQL server educement. We anticipate to increase our utilization of TEAM International over the next 18 months.

Was there a dedicated team?

We currently have two educeers and one QA individual below contract. Their fruition director interacts with us to shape the project and we also adjoin with the organisation’s chairman on a customary basis.

How did you come to work with TEAM International?

I searched for outsourcing partners on Google and they came up. I noticed they weren’t too far from me geographically, so I gave them a call. We selected them over firms we’ve worked with in the past due to their onshore project treatment team. That makes it easy for me to get in touch with their chairman or our assigned fruition director.

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

We’ve spent just below $300,000 thus far.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

We began working unitedly in 2017 and the engagement is ongoing.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

My biggest interest is their power to prepare condition liberateables for a cost-saving cost. They do an unappropriated job at a much lower rate than the educement firms in our area. Each web app they complete offices according to the project’s requirements. They work within our procedures and get along big with the existing staff. They’ve even been given separate peer awards for laudable work.

How did TEAM International execute from a project treatment standpoint?

Management responsibilities are mainly delegated to our inner team. But as far as allocating resources when we need them and having them locate promptly, TEAM International executes excellently. We use Microsoft Team Foundation Server to track and handle code. Beyond that, we use Slack for day-to-day interactions between educeers and directors. Lastly, we have daily stands-ups via phone calls or WebEx.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

We esteem their responsiveness and the condition of resources that they prepare. In accession to a speech barrier, other offshore companies frequently have low-condition phone connections. Having to reiterate things over and over due to background sound isn’t fruitive. TEAM International speaks excellent English and uses up-to-date technology. Those factors make them significantly easier to work with than most firms in the market.

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

We were trying to ramp up fastly for a specific project and happened to ask a lot of them at the unfit time. They didn',t have the resources we needed as fastly as required to complete the project within the timeline we were pushing. We worked through those issues, but that experience was likely an irregularity due to outer factors. They also have assistant business units that we tried out, but those services didn’t liberate the permissive results we’ve come to anticipate from TEAM International. I’ve adjoind these interests to their chairman.

Do you have any advice for possible clients?

They work best whenever we come to them with a detailed program of what we want to execute and how many resources are needed.