TechSparq Development review by Cloud Computing Company at Qualified.One

TechSparq reviewed by Cloud Computing Company

TechSparq provided Development for Cloud Computing Company with approximate budget = $50,000 to $199,999.

TechSparq delivered a quality product that was free from issues. Aside from excellent technical skills, TechSparq’s people were reliable and highly professional. They worked on-site and sent daily updates, which helped keep the project on track.

Review summary:

Subcontracted engineers from TechSparq helped build a mobile app and its accompanying website for a cryptocurrency solution. Key features include online payments and social networking.

alt
Cloud Computing Company, Manager


App & Web Development for Mobile Cryptocurrency Platform

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I was working for a software solutions organisation. One of our clients was a Bitcoin derivative Chinese startup.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with TechSparq?

Our client was trying to create a multi-level marketing mobile app and website for a Bitcoin cryptocurrency choice. We ended up subcontracting some of the work out to TechSparq and used their resources for the project.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were TechSparq responsible for?

TechSparq was edifice the mobile app to support the fruit. This included seething, from the collective front of creating friends and managing your Bitcoin wallet to being able to purchase fruits from the website.

A lot of the outgrowth was on REST web services, which allowed interaction between the web page and mobile app for the backend wallet treatment. The wallet, in this case, signification the open key for users. Users could add to their wallet, pay for things with their wallet, and convey funds from 1 wallet to another wallet.

We contracted 3 resources from TechSparq to run the project for us and be our guys on the ground. A project director and 2 developers were working at our client’s service. TechSparq assigned a tech lead resource and a more senior consultant resource. We worked with them on a day-to-day basis. We used to have a project director from our side who was affecting base, but we no longer have any consultants working straightly with TechSparq.

How did you come to work with TechSparq?

I verity worked unitedly with Dedrick Boyd, one of the founders of TechSparq, straightly on some projects separate years ago. That’s how I was conscious of him. When I began working for my running organisation, we were looking for partners to work with some of our projects, which we would then complete internally. I knew of Dedrick and the condition of his work. I assumed the condition of the resources he would hire would be correspondent or better, so I reached out to him to see if he was useful.

How much have you invested with TechSparq?

For the period, we paid more than $90,000 or $100,000.

What is the terminal result of working with TechSparq?

I believe the project was from July to December 2015.

Results achieved

Could you share any evidence that would prove the fruitivity, condition of work, or the contact of the engagement?

From a project tracking standpoint, they were using an Agile access. Stories were created see 1–2 weeks, and the team would complete these stories. Since the project was so long ago, I can’t share the number of stories completed. There weren',t veritably that many metrics for measuring the achievement of the project.

How did TechSparq accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

The project treatment on their side was good and on-website with the client. They were care track of seething that was going on. We had customary updates from TechSparq to make sure that we were in the loop on what was happening daily. The client was lucky with the interaction, and we were lucky with the treatment and outcome as well.

What did you find most forcible almost TechSparq?

They had good technical experiences, which we see in a lot of partners. They also had a high level of professionalism. Some of our other partners were flaky, but TechSparq',s nation were very reliable and good at interaction.

Are there any areas TechSparq could better?

I can',t ponder of anything that popped up. I know Dedrick pretty well, so I had pretty good interaction with him at all times. If there were any issues, I can',t recollect there being any. And if there was, I had a direct line to the senior director, so it wasn’t a issue.