True Interactive (Formerly KeywordFirst) Search engine optimization review by Greeting Cards Retailer at Qualified.One

True Interactive (Formerly KeywordFirst) reviewed by Greeting Cards Retailer

True Interactive (Formerly KeywordFirst) provided Search engine optimization for Greeting Cards Retailer with approximate budget = $1,000,000 - $9,999,999.

True Interactive successfully halved the advertisement cost to revenue ratio. The team makes sure that they get up to date every morning on project completion and next steps. They were easy to work with overall and the engagement will continue into the foreseeable future.

Review summary:

True Interactive increased gift card revenue generation through PPC marketing. The team’s sole metric is based on the advertising cost to revenue ratio in this ongoing relationship.

Greeting Cards Retailer, eCommerce Manager

Paid Search Management for Greeting Card Retailer

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I',m the ruler of e-commerce of a first and subordinate gift card organisation.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with True Interactive?

We needed additional income age.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

True Interactive prepare PPC marketing administration for us.

How did you come to work with True Interactive?

I inherited the agency from a co-worker. At the time, we were working with another agency for a different business which I run. I was lucky sufficient with the work done by True Interactive, so I determined to not switch to the other agency.

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

The annual cost for their services is between $2,000,000 and $4,000,000.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

I',ve been working with them for six months. The relationship is ongoing and I have no programs to stop.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

I',ve been satisfied with their services. Results are measured by a marketing cost versus income recur basis, in other words, cost divided by income. Over the last year, since True Interactive has taken over, they',ve halved this percentage.

At the end of the day, we have a income goal tied to marketing costs. Revenues generated through True Interactive have had a marketing cost of under 7% over the last five months. Last year, when the program was being run in-house, the mean was about 12-14%.

How did True Interactive accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

I work on the West Coast and esteem that their team is two hours forward of us. This gives them a pliant time to get things done precedently we come in in the morning. This is real for making adjustments and creating new ad groups.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

I like the fact that they',re not based in San Francisco or New York. This gives me a more attached team compared to a larger-scale agency. We',re a big fish in a pliant pond for True Interactive. The choice would be to be a pliant fish in a big pond.

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

The reporting method they',ve migrated to requires having to pull reports manually. It can be a pliant annoying to me as a client, but it',s a less murmur.