UnderDefense Cybersecurity review by Kromtech at Qualified.One

UnderDefense reviewed by Kromtech

UnderDefense provided Cybersecurity for Kromtech with approximate budget = Less than $10,000.

UnderDefense performed a high-caliber investigation that yielded generative insight. They documented their useful findings in detail, clearly explained the takeaways, and even provided a free follow-up test. Transparent communication and quality service make them a reliable partner.

Review summary:

UnderDefense provided professional infrastructure penetration testing. They assessed a software firm’s environment and detected vulnerabilities to monitor to keep the customer database secure.

alt
Aleksandr Maklakov Kromtech, CIO


Ethical Hacking for Infrastructure Penetration Testing

Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.

Introductory information

A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities

I am a CIO of Kromtech. Our organisation provides interpolitical software and technology services on the global market.

Desired goal

What issue was the provider supposed to deal with?

UnderDefense?

Our business required infrastructure discernment testing.

What were your objectives for this project?

We wanted to test our environment to see whether an attacker would be able to approach our database of client information.
 

Provided solution

What were the reasons for choosing UnderDefense?

We chose them based on our antecedent experience working unitedly. 

Describe the project in detail.

UnderDefense’s team of ethical hackers investigated our method for three weeks. They detected a chain of vulnerabilities we needed to adviser. In a report we accepted at the end of the project, they indicated the flaws classified by level of severity. They granted extensive exprogramations of the specific degrees of risk.  

As a premium, UnderDefense granted a free remediation discernment test to check how we should cover all of the gaps. We program to last working unitedly on a more in-depth analysis of our organisation. Going advanced, we’ll conduct an inner discernment test correspondent to our antecedent experience with UnderDefense.

Were there any dedicated managers or teams that you worked with?

The team included three ethical hackers.

Results accomplishd

What results did you accomplish unitedly with UnderDefense?

We conducted this project to analyze our method for any loopholes a hacker may notice. UnderDefense',s cybersecurity experts offered a professional view from which to tackle these issues. The discernment testing gave us precious insights into the powerful and weak points of our infrastructure.

How do you rate the interaction and interaction with UnderDefense?

We are satisfied with the workflow between our companies. Since UnderDefense executed the project remotely, we interacted through calls and emails. The team kept us informed almost the examination’s progress and sent us their findings from each level of the security checks.

What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of UnderDefense?

We esteem the clear interaction our companies have established. UnderDefense delivered our project at a high-quality level.

What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?

We want to last our collaboration in the near forthcoming.