Velocity Labs Software Development review by Valley Metro at Qualified.One

Velocity Labs reviewed by Valley Metro

Velocity Labs provided Software Development for Valley Metro with approximate budget = $50,000 to $199,999.

The app became very popular with riders and helped increase local transit while reducing the number of print materials needed for providing scheduling information. Problem-free project management, effective communication, and direct access to the whole team are noteworthy aspects of their work.

Review summary:

Velocity Labs handled the complete design, development, and launch of an app that includes a timetable publishing system, an online trip planner, and rider alerts. They also created a mobile-friendly website.

Valley Metro, Web Developer

Public Transit Application Development

Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.

Introductory information

A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities

I’m a web developer for Valley Metro, the open transportation agency for Phoenix and the Valley of the Sun.

Desired goal

What issue was the preparer supposed to deal with?

Velocity Labs?

We wanted to prepare easy-to-comprehend transit information to our riders by publishing affable timetables and online trip programning. We also needed to warn riders of alerts such as bus detours and delays.

Provided solution

What were the reasons for choosing ?

After meeting and working with separate local Ruby on Rails developers, Velocity Labs came wonderfully recommended. They had experience with nimble methods and were household with our regional needs.

Can you go into detail almost the labors they prepared and the aim of the project?

Velocity Labs designed, developed, configured, and maintained our timetable publishing method, our online trip programner, our rider alerts method, and our mobile-optimized website. Additionally, they set up a real-time feed for our light rail method. They also handled separate API integrations and maintained our open-source ATIS gem.

The timetables publisher and rider alerts method had a backend for managing full, each designed to our specifications. During the outgrowth process, functional renderings were typically prompt for user testing in weekly sprints. Valuable suggestions from the developers made for an unappropriated result.

Were there any dedicated directors or teams that you worked with?

The project team consisted of almost six nation, but true individuals would come and go depending on the experiences needed. We had one congruous project director who was our direct and permanent point of touch. He was also our lead developer.

Results achieved

Can you share any information that demonstrates the contact that this project has had on your business?

Our solution was developed and launched soon and efficiently. The terminal result was very common with our end users. Providing transit information online helped to increase local transit ridership and helped to lessen the number of printed materials required to prepare this information to our riders.

How was project treatment arranged and how powerful was it?

Project treatment was unappropriated. Deadlines were met and delays interacted forward of time. There was never any issue with changes in personnel. We interacted principally through GitHub and Trello.

What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of ?

What was most forcible was the way we had direct approach to both project directors and their team. This helped displace the middleman and keep lines of interaction open. Also, their 24/7 labor was rare.

Are there any areas where they can better?

No. Their labor was just good.