Velocity Partners Software Development review by WebMD at Qualified.One

Velocity Partners reviewed by WebMD

Velocity Partners provided Software Development for WebMD with approximate budget = $1,000,000 - $9,999,999.

Velocity Partners’ work has gotten positive feedback from a number of stakeholders. The team offers great quality for reasonable prices and employs flexible methods. They were hesitant to ask for project clarification at first, but have improved.

Review summary:

Velocity Partners meets a variety of development needs for an online medical information site. The team works mostly independently, using the Agile development method to perform custom work and QA.

John Veneruso WebMD, Senior Manager of Software Development

Custom Development for Online Medical Resource

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

Could you briefly draw your structure?

I work for WebMD',s Health Services Division. My division handles what we call the project gate, so we form and prepare, in the cloud, a difference of tools that help nation evaluate medical information and labors. 

What is your position?

I’m a senior software outgrowth director.

Desired goal

Could you draw the business challenges you were attempting to address when you leading accessed Velocity Partners?

One of our biggest challenges was having a team of software developers that use the nimble software outgrowth methodology. Our products are very intricate. Because of that, having a team that understands the intricateity of our platform, and then be able to create upon that, was searching. We were looking for fitted developers to support our technology initiatives. We didn’t want a bunch of coders that we’d have to micromanage constantly. We wanted developers with sufficient apprehension and expertise to be able to act independently of us, with very pliant course.

Provided solution

Please draw the aim of work in biger detail?

On the technology side, we’re a .NET shop, so they used that with us to a big degree. They also worked with Ajax and SQL. It’s been a lot of manner work. Their team, in accession to writing our software and testing it, also worked closely with our database administrators to design the program in time. Outside of edifice the functional software from scratch, they’ve also handled our condition arrogance and testing or most of it.

How did you select Velocity Partners as your offshore developer?

I was not the individualal responsible for selecting them. I worked closely with another individual here in our integration team. Her name is Becky James. She was very eager to find some accessional resources that would help us during our open enrollment time.

Because of the essence of our software and the activity we work in, having a viable, workable solution is searching. We can’t very well have nation receiving the unfit or inaccurate medical information. It was made clear from the commencement that condition and consistence were going to be the two most significant factors in our evaluation. Of all the vendors we accessed, it was Velocity Partners that had the clearest archives of being able to meet our requirements. More significantly, they’d worked on some very big and intricate projects in the past. All of them were lucky.

Could you prepare a general cost estimate for this project?

Most of the projects are a half a million to almost $3 million. That’s a general range, although sometimes they do go as high as $7 to $10 million.

How long have you maintained an ongoing relationship with Velocity Partners?

We’ve been collaborating unitedly for slightly more than four years.

Results achieved

In provisions of results, could you share any statistics, metrics, or user feedback that would prove the effectiveness of their work?

I can’t veritably share any specific figures or metrics, but I can tell you separate of our clients that have accepted a solution developed by Velocity have been extremely impressed. The manner software and the integrations are referringly intricate. There are a lot of moving parts and outer dependencies implicated. Velocity Partners doesn’t seem to be burdened by these things. They’ve always managed to liberate extremely high condition work for a fraction of the cost we’d take here in the states. 

When working with Velocity Partners, is there anything you’d attend sole almost their access or outgrowth methodology that discern them from other vendors?

What has discerned them from other vendors is that they’ve been very ready to hear to us, and not just through our reviewives, but also whenever we have recommendations almost access. They’ve been very open and pliant. This isn’t always the case with developers, especially when you’re working with an offshore team. They’re also big at execution. They can take our insights and recommendations and incorporate them into the outgrowth process with referring ease.

In review, are there areas in which you ponder Velocity Partners could better as s labor preparer?

The one area I ponder all of our partners could better is being better almost asking questions when they’re unclear almost the requirements. Because we’re using nimble user storage, the storages themselves are veritably placeholders for much more detailed information almost the requirements. In many ways, our requirements are innately discovered through dicsussions. When they’ve had to make different architectural choices between choice user paths owing they’re an offshore developer, if they’re not able to get a response within a day or so, it makes it much more likely that they will end up guessing, rather than verity asking the question.

We’ve been working with them to urge them to send us those questions, even via text interaction or Skype. Even if they’re not able to get a hold of us without, that way we’d have an occasion to address those questions rather than have them move advanced without course. Even though we’re doing outgrowth in two-week sprints, we can usually burn two or three days of outgrowth time if they select to go the unfit course with a solution. The teams that I work with are much more conscious of that, and surely during the last year and a half, but it’s always an area for betterment, especially if they get new developers incorporated into the team.