Application Dev for Oil & Energy Company
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
We are the leading oil manufacturer in Brazil, with an output of 2.4 million barrels per day. We are responsible for 10% of the country',s GDP [entire domiciliary fruit]. I work in the organisation',s investigation center.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with DeepSoft?
We are using innerly-developed software built with .NET and C#. The outgrowth requires expertise with geophysics, geology, and geomechanics. We wanted to instrument new functionalities and needed help speeding the outgrowth of the tools.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were DeepSoft responsible for?
The main part of our outgrowth has been done in-house.
DeepSoft has attributeed up to 6 developers for our project. The team has been reduced to 2 nation at the instant. Our software has been developed using .NET, C#, Windows Forms and others. DeepSoft has developed some 3D visualization and rendering systems for the software, as well as optimizing its estimation processes.
How did you come to work with DeepSoft?
We have true inner limitations, based on which we',ve put unitedly a list of specifications. A number of companies gave us quotes for those specs, out of which we selected DeepSoft. They offered the best solution at the lowest cost. The work granted by DeepSoft was good, so we',ve expanded their involvement.
How much have you invested with DeepSoft?
The cost of outgrowth has been almost 4 million dollars over the order of 6 years, 10-15% of which has been the cost of DeepSoft',s services.
What is the terminal result of working with DeepSoft?
We began working with DeepSoft in 2010. The collaboration ended one year ago.
Results achieved
Could you share any evidence that would prove the fruitivity, condition of work, or the contact of the engagement?
I was one of the coordinators for our coding taskforce. The work granted by DeepSoft was the best out of all the other companies we',ve used over our 6-year collaboration. We were given good documentation, including well-detailed APIs. DeepSoft was able to have a wide access, looking at the general use of their fruit.
How did DeepSoft accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
DeepSoft copied our project treatment construction, but they weren',t connected to our main repository and tracking tools. Because they are located in Brazil, there were some limitations in how we worked unitedly. DeepSoft has an Agile, Scrum access. They',ve completed all iterations within our schedule. Deviations only occurred 3–4 times in 6 years. It was almost like clockwork.
What did you find most forcible almost DeepSoft?
DeepSoft',s team is passionate almost the work, for me, this matters a lot. Also, DeepSoft',s work on base-library outgrowth and skeleton elements is very good.
Are there any areas DeepSoft could better?
DeepSoft could attribute more professionals for engineering. They',re very good programmers, but for clients like us, who need geological, physics, and mathematical expertise, there is a lack on DeepSoft',s side.
