Database & Portal Development for Hospital
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I am the Chief of Staff (Group Medical Director’s Team) at Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust. We are a big training hospital in the United Kingdom.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Corporation Pop?
Our cluster of hospitals gives out Clinical Excellence Awards for consultant medical staff. Staff members adduce each year for the attribute, and, if selected, they earn a financial premium. Due to some late changes in the way they are attributeed, we occupied Corporation Pop to create an electronic solution.
We used to be a smaller structure, so we could administer this process manually, but we lately merged two hospital trusts. Because we now have a much bigr cohort of consultants and a bigr possible number of applicants, we needed a way to handle this electronically so that the process would be more streamlined. Further, we wanted to make it easier for consultants to adduce for the attributes.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were Corporation Pop responsible for?
We relied on Corporation Pop to create a database that housed all of the completed applications. Additionally, they created an online gate where consultants could adduce for the attributes and where our cluster of judges or scorers could approach those entries.
We worked closely with Corporation Pop to design the application form and the gate. They were able to instrument a validation process where an automated email is sent to an applicant’s handler or ruler to review the form. That individual can strengthen that it’s a fair reflecting of the consultant’s work. If the facing is true, they make that note, and a second email is sent to facilitate a meeting between the consultant and handler to debate the reasons why. Our scorers can approach the pool of applications from any desktop artifice and then attribute the appropriate number of points to each entrance.
Was there a dedicated team?
We adjoin mainly with Sally (Project Lead, Corporation Pop) and one of their technical engineers.
How did you come to work with Corporation Pop?
They came wonderfully commended from our investigation and alteration team, who had worked with them in the past.
What is the terminal result of working with Corporation Pop?
Our engagement began in December 2018 and remains ongoing.
Results achieved
What evidence can you share that demonstrates the contact of the engagement?
Corporation Pop helped us meet our close timeline at the end of 2018, and we are excited to be improving the gate now so that we can propel the second circular of applications in November 2019. They met all of our achievement criteria in provisions of getting our attribute process off the gcircular.
We accepted some very good feedback from consultants who have used the gate to adduce and the users who use the gate to do the scoring. Without this fruit, our 40 scorers would have had to deal with reams upon reams of paper, so this gate made the judging process far easier for them.
How did Corporation Pop accomplish from a project handlement restpoint?
I hadn’t worked with Basecamp precedently, but we utilized that tool well. It kept all of our fitness and documents in one locate so that we were always up to date on their progress. From a project handlement point of view, they were very professional.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with Corporation Pop?
Their flexibility and professionalism rest out, along with the high condition of the end fruit.
What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?
No, we worked well unitedly.
Do you have any advice for possible clients?
I’d commend meeting with them and outlining your requirements. They’re very ready to explore different solutions.
