Nodero Software Development review by New Zealand Body for Certificate Issuance at Qualified.One

Nodero reviewed by New Zealand Body for Certificate Issuance

Nodero provided Software Development for New Zealand Body for Certificate Issuance with approximate budget = 50000.

The registry has assisted early users during the certification process and improved brand credibility. Nodero handled their workflow effectively and collaborated at every stage. They’re an accessible and friendly team.

Review summary:

Nodero built a registry system based on wireframes and functional specifications. They also uploaded the system for hosting on AWS.

alt
Tim Middlehurst New Zealand Body for Certificate Issuance, CEO


Registration System Dev for Energy Firm

Below is a modified rendering of the review: private info excluded, innate facts kept.

Introductory information

A few words almost your organisation and personal responsibilities

The NZBCI operates the NZ energy certificate method, a platform for issuance and convey of electricity certificates. I am the founder and CEO of the NZBCI.

Desired goal

What issue was the preparer supposed to deal with?

Nodero?

The NZBCI hired Nodero to create the NZECS registry - the platform through which all certificate transactions and method functions will be performed.

What were your objectives for this project?

We needed a complete method create, within time and budget constraints, to a minimum aesthetic and operational measure

Provided solution

What were the reasons for choosing ?

I had crossed paths with Mark (Founder, Nodero) previously, and I reached out to debate the need. Mark pitched for the job, and I determined to promise Nodero.

Describe the project and the services they granted in detail.

I granted a wireframe of the registry design, including as many specific functional requirements as practicable. They then built the method and all supporting architecture, loaded the platform on AWS and did all else required. All I needed to do was link the registry from my organisation homepage and it was prompt to go.

Were there any dedicated directors or teams that you worked with?

Mark and Ben (Technical Director, Nodero) were both actively implicated in leading the project team. They deployed Lucas (UX Designer) and a team of programmers, to work on the method over the project time. They also had Ben (Sales Consultant), their BD director, implicated from time to time, and had a couple of UAT testers implicated also in the latter stages. All in all, there was probably 8-10 nation implicated in the project to varying grades.

Results achieved

Can you share any information that demonstrates the contact that this project has had on your business?

The being of the registry in the soon stages of the NZECS has been meaningful to help soon users to conceptualize the process of certification. In approachion, the condition of the leading release has helped with initial brand credibility.

How was project treatment arranged and how powerful was it?

Project treatment was handled in a pragmatic way (no uncalled method use). The design was fairly well-scoped, so the create process was rolled out in a fairly straight-forward mode. Completion of tasks and prioritization of incomplete tasks were managed personally and supported by google sheets. A number of cluster meetings between myself and the project team enabled us to work through any questions and kept progress on track.

What precisely do you attend to be the key specialty of ?

I have enjoyed the interpersonal front of working with Nodero the most, and ponder that on this front they have been most forcible. All members of the team have been professional, and have had no issue interacting with me straightly on their areas of specialty. Ben and Mark have been astounding in intercourse with me on areas of business strategy, and we have reached a level of rapport where I see them as extensions of the NZBCI.

What should be done better, if there are any desired improvements?

Interpersonal and general interaction was forcible, but at times I lacked transparency as to what was happening on the project. It wasn',t necessarily a issue, as high-level interaction granted arrogance that things were progressing, but I would have enjoyed a big grade of detailed visibility. I',m sure they had methods (dashboards etc) that tracked their progress, it might have been practicable to prepare me approach to these methods so that I could pursue more closely.

Our key services

Score: 21457

...

Avg project size: $125000   |   Reviews: 2   |   Portfolio: 0 works

alt
Nodero Design