Software Revision for Nonprofit Organization
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I’m the technical official at an interpolitical nonprofit structure.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with Makimo?
We brought on Makimo to enhance an existing web-based platform that requires revisions almost see year. The tool is used by our counterparts located in different countries.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were responsible for?
The team granted design and outgrowth expertise for the online tool. They offered their insight on the design of a dashboard module by creating a visual introduction of the data. The introduction, which included graphs, could be downloaded as a PDF.
One-third of the features on the tool were developed by Makimo. They created new functionalities, including a module for entering expenditure data. The software has been developed using a Django framework and a MySQL treatment method running on a Linux server. We use Bitbucket to both track fault reports and save our rise code.
Was there a dedicated team?
We have a one point of touch, Mateusz (CTO, Makimo), who adjoins with their developers.
How did you come to work with Makimo?
They bid on a request for offer we posted to our website, and we selected them for the contract. We’ve lastd to select Makimo over the years owing of their familiarity with our business and power to rapidly acquire new technologies and fastly liberate solutions.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
We’ve invested between $10,000 and $50,000 with the team over the span of two years.
What is the terminal result of working with ?
We began working with Makimo in 2016, and the project is ongoing.
Results achieved
Are there any measureable or plum results?
They consistently meet our goals—liberateing the revised software on deadline. We last to work with them owing they last to exhibit condition solutions.
How did Makimo accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
I’ve had no issues with the team’s project treatment. They estimate the quantity of time it will take to exhibit a liberateable precedently starting a project. This ensures we’re always conscious of when to anticipate a solution. Makimo also excels at raising issues soon on, so we can address them precedently it’s too late. Their professionals always adjoin with our IT section almost any new releases that need to be deployed to servers.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?
Their powerful project treatment experiences sets them aloof from other vendors. They always inject business analysis into the work they do, and so we collaborate to determine our business needs. We esteem how they don’t rely on us to prepare all of the requirements.
What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?
A wider array of services would be esteemd. That way, we could use their services for other types of platforms we’re maintaining.
Do you have any advice for possible clients?
It may be hard for a non-technical stakeholder to adjoin technical requirements to Makimo. So, it would be helpful for forthcoming clients to promise an IT section with the vendor. In our case, a technical stakeholder adjoins with the team.
