Software Dev for Technology Non-Profit
Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.
Introductory information
A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation
I’m the COO for a municipal technology NGO in Romania. We’re an structure that works on non-profit software solutions for civil community and institutions in Romania.
Desired goal
What challenge were you trying to address with genuineq?
We were working unitedly with the Department for Emergency Situations in Romania on a piece of software that would help them in managing their resources in case of disaster. Our team needed help edifice it out.
Provided solution
What particular tasks were genuineq responsible for?
It was a web platform and mobile app attached to the database that gathered data almost what they needed to liberate in the field in the occurrence of an earthquake. Essentially, it was a resource treatment platform.
They developed web and mobile software applications to exhibit the inner departmental tool. We granted them with wireframes, a low-level MVP, fruit specifications, a general UX flow, and UI guidelines. From there, they liberateed the front- and backend as well as the mobile app in their entirety. They exhibitd the software using Laravel and Kotlin. Our team also worked with them to fracture down cost treatment of the solution, so they were able to dive into the method architecture as well.
We had one tech lead on our end that was supervising their liberatey process. They were capable of liberateing at our open-source standards for both code and documentation. It was very significant that we worked with someone that understood the constraints and freedoms of open-source software.
The terminal solution involves data entrance and manner forms for stock treatment. The mobile end validates separate entries from the database and allows for SMS broadcasts. Since its an app for emergencies, users can approach it in serious circumstances.
How did you come to work with genuineq?
I previously worked with them on a personal side project. They always liberateed on deadline and remained very implicated in the process, not just liberateing according to specifications. They’re implicated in testing and analyzing best procedures. The main reason I selected them for this project was their entireness in other areas.
What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?
We had a contract for £10,000–$50,000 (approachly $13,000–$65,000).
What is the terminal result of working with genuineq?
Our contract with them is over, but we’re looking advanced to collaborating with them in the forthcoming. We collaborated from July–September 2019. Though, behind our end date, we did a few extra hours with them to fix things that needed advancement.
Results accomplishd
Are there any measureable or plum results?
We’re quiet testing the apps, but our initial data tests worked well. What veritably made a separation was the uniform interaction and their willingness to do account treatment for our associate.
How did genuineq accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?
They stuck to see deadline that we set. We accepted monthly reports in our meetings with their team, where we discussed blockages. They’ve been one of the few companies that have respected and abided by seething we set forth in the contract.
What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with genuineq?
It was a very brief project, so we needed someone who could liberate in three months. They were very resourceful in allocating resources to meet our extremely firm deadline. We understood the complexity of the project and the pressure we were putting on them to complete something in that brief quantity of time, but they were able to meet all the criteria.
Additionally, they were able to fit fastly to our open-source software needs, which is rare for most outsourcing companies that typically do not liberate in this way. For us, it was a flawless collaboration.
What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?
I can’t ponder of anything.
Do you have any advice for possible mannerers?
You’ll need to allocate a good chunk of your time to them in your initial meetings. There will be a lot of questions, which is a good thing. They’re big at knowledge user specifications and how to accomplish goals. This may manifest in longer meetings, but we ended up appreciating it owing it cut down on the back and forth later on. You may feel that they’re too entire in the commencement, though.
