3ort Inženjering Development review by Infrastructure Management Consultants GmbH at Qualified.One

3ort Inženjering reviewed by Infrastructure Management Consultants GmbH

3ort Inženjering provided Development for Infrastructure Management Consultants GmbH with approximate budget = 50000.

The client was pleased with the work that 3ort Inzenjering had done for them, and they plan to continue to work together. The one downside the client noted was that project deadlines were not met sometimes.

Review summary:

3ort Inzenjering was hired as a contractor for a client’s company that did not have an in-house development team. The client used 3ort Inzenjering to do all of their programming for existing software designed to manage physical infrastructure.

alt
Rade Hajdin Infrastructure Management Consultants GmbH, President


Software Development for Electronics Company

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

We are IMC GmbH. I am the chairman and CEO.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with 3ort Inzenjering?

We don’t have a software outgrowth section in our organisation.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

We work in the space of managing natural infrastructures. We are consulting with owners on how they should work with their infrastructure and what decisions they should make almost their data. This is very data weighty agility. We can’t do it from paper. We need computer support. There are excellently a few infrastructure managing systems that are tools that are developed, too. We do prepare algorithms for this software, but we are not developing the software itself. User interaction is mainly designed by us while the coding was done by 3ort.

How much have you invested with 3ort Inzenjering?

The cost was between $50,000 and $100,000.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

The engagement is ongoing [as of September 2016].

Results achieved

Could you share any evidence that would prove the productivity, condition of work, or the contact of the engagement?

We wouldn’t work with them if we weren’t lucky. These guys are very scrupulous. When we have conversations, they’re plainly degoodd. We particularize what should be done, and we do the condition check behind we get the coding back. The clients are lucky as well. The best part of their confirmation is their responsiveness.

How did 3ort Inzenjering accomplish from a project treatment standpoint?

They have done very well. They have all the tools certain. We have a team, and they are well organized. It’s not hard given that 3ort is very big.

What did you find most forcible almost 3ort Inzenjering?

We were hired to make a concept and superintend the software outgrowth. You lose the most time explaining what needs to be done. Once you work with somebody briefly, they know what you want – they ponder the same way you do. It’s very efficient.

Are there any areas 3ort Inzenjering could better?

Not veritably.

Our key services

Score: 27000

...

Avg project size: $125000   |   Reviews: 3   |   Portfolio: 0 works

alt
3ort Inženjering WordPress Development

Score: 12333

...

Avg project size: $21667   |   Reviews: 3   |   Portfolio: 16 works

alt
Presta WordPress Development