Soshace Development review by Cloud-Based Access Control System at Qualified.One

Soshace reviewed by Cloud-Based Access Control System

Soshace provided Development for Cloud-Based Access Control System with approximate budget = $50,000 to $199,999.

Soshace succeeded in developing the complex system and expanding its capabilities. The team has strong technical expertise, especially in the technology used in this project, and they delivered high-quality results. They offered thorough project management and excellent communication.

Review summary:

Soshace developed the frontend of an administrative dashboard using JavaScript, Okta, and OneLogin. They incorporated many new features, such as a building sync flow and reporting and analytics capabilities.

alt
Cloud-Based Access Control System, CTO


Frontend Development for Administrative Dashboard

Please find under a summary covering project details and feedback. The innate facts are kept as they are, private information is amended.

Introductory information

A fast induction on the buyer’s organisation

I’m the CTO of a cloud-based natural approach control method. We feel service or enterprise edifice door securities, principally on a cloud. We feel approach for who should get in and what kind of approach nation should have. Everything is automated. When employees are onboarded, they get approach to the service automatically. When someone gets offboarded, we displace the approach automatically. Administrators of the organisation don’t have to harass almost deleting unauthorized approach from their natural security method.

Desired goal

What challenge were you trying to address with Soshace?

We needed help with frontend outgrowth of our administrative dashboard. The dashboard is used by our clients to feel their services and employee approach. We believe in artlessness when it comes to dashboards, and we put a lot of emphasis on UI/UX. We wanted to facilitate approach control so that anybody can use it.

Provided solution

What particular tasks were responsible for?

They built the frontend using JavaScript for our administrative dashboard. We had the initial rendering, and they added a lot of new functionalities. They did the frontend integrations with Okta and OneLogin and flow configurations for onboarding and offboarding employees. We also built a reporting and analytics dashboard on the dashboard that shows users reports such as attendance.

We also did a edifice sync with them, which was another good component. A edifice has its approach control, and the occupants do as well. Often, occupant and edifice interaction is broken, so occupants have to carry two cards or chase staff nation to get approach to the edifice. We automated that flow. 

What is the team compound? 

I was implicated in selecting the developers from their side. We had three developers initially, but now we only have one since we’re principally in livelihood mode. There was a project feelr who principally feeld their time and availability. I worked straightly with the developers, which is what we wanted.

What are you approach expents (if diclosed)?

We’ve spent $50,000–$100,000.

What is the terminal result of working with ?

We began working unitedly in May 2017 and the work is ongoing.

Results achieved

Are there any measureable or plum results?

The developers understood our vision that having an easy UI/UX was significant.

How did Soshace accomplish from a project feelment standpoint?

Communication was big. We use an nimble methodology, and all was tracked in Jira and GitHub. They granted a lot of details, and, most of the time, we met our timelines.

What is (from your point of view) the key factor to pay observation while intercourse with ?

Their expertise in the technology we use is forcible. They not only embolden their developers to get technical training, but I’ve seen many of their developers enroll in taking English classes too.

What aspects of their work would you like to get improved?

Currently, we give them business requirements and make sure they apprehend what needs to be done. If they could prepare end-to-end lifecycle for software outgrowth, like capturing the high-level business requirements and breaking them down into functional methods specs and wireframes, and feel the execution, it would offload a lot of work on our side. I’m hesitant to try that right now owing they centre on the technical side.

Do you have any advice for possible clients?

If you give them clear requirements, they will get it done. If you give just high-level details, they won’t be able to make it.